The Face Of Dev At 4:30AM

The ultimate chaos decree! Pushing directly to main is basically the software equivalent of playing Russian roulette with production. Any seasoned developer knows that mandating "all developers must push to main" is like ordering everyone to juggle flaming chainsaws while blindfolded. The beauty of git branches is they let you break things in isolation before merging your dumpster fire with everyone else's code. This executive order would send shivers down the spine of any DevOps engineer – it's basically declaring "let there be bugs!" Might as well set up a dedicated Slack channel called #production-is-down-again for the inevitable aftermath.

Content 4.074 Kids these days will never know the struggle 0 4996 of cc32e17.exe Completed Saving: cc from ito netscape.com 00000000000000 Estimated time left 39 years 889 MB of 180 MB copied) Download to D MOther stuffDownload:cc32e47. exe Transfer tale: 4.61 KBSec Close this dialog bow when download completes Open Open Folder cancel spiletta42 This is not an exaggeration. Your download speed would slow down to the point where Windows would make this kind of absurd estimate, and you'd sigh and leave the room for a while (because you couldn't use the computer while it was doing this for fear it would crash and lose all your progress) and then you'd come back in 40 minutes and maybe it would now say 52 years or maybe it would say 3 minutes, who knew, not Windows.

The pinnacle of StackOverflow irony: your Docker localhost question is flagged as a duplicate of a post that's been closed for not being about programming, which has 5x more upvotes than the "correct" question. Meanwhile, both questions are closed for completely contradictory reasons. It's like trying to exit Vim - no matter what you do, you're trapped in an endless cycle of "closed," "duplicate," and "not about programming" while desperately trying to figure out why your container can't see localhost. The cherry on top? The 2.8 million views suggest thousands of developers have the exact same "not programming related" problem.

Content 558 mart Expo ME WAITING FOR COMPLINGTOEND: 4. 50 8, A h Please wait patiently for the failure of the system. imaflio.com

Ah, the classic Reddit ASCII Snoo recruitment technique. Nothing says "we need developers" like hiding job ads in the console where only the curious nerds will find them. It's like leaving cheese in a mousetrap, except the cheese is a job opportunity and the mouse is a developer who can't help but inspect every website they visit. Twenty years in the industry and companies are still pulling the "How do you do, fellow hackers?" routine. Gotta respect the hustle though—beats those "we're like a family" job listings.

Content Is it possible to disable the network in iOS Simulator? Get personalized job matches now stackoverflow Get started 281 am trying to debug some inconsistent behaviour I am seeing in an application that gets its primary data from the internet. I don't see the issues in the simulator, just on the device, so l'd like to reproduce the network and connectivity environment in the simulator. Is there any way of disabling the network in the simulator? 17 Answers active oldest Use a simple Faraday cage to block or limit the external RF signal level. 1214 You can make your own with aluminum foil. The openings should be smaller than the wavelength of your data service if that's what you want to block. 800 Mhz has a 37 cm (14) wavelength, 1900 Mhz has a 16 cm (6) wavelength. This works better with an actual device than with the simulator since the Mac is hard to work on when inside the Faraday cage ;-) share improve this answer edited Aug 27 '13 at 19:56 answered Dec 12 '12 at 1:12 , progrmr 57.2k 13 88 135