Should I tell them?

The sweet summer child thinks he's conquered the world after fixing compiler errors. "Goodbye compiler errors! I will never suffer again!" he proclaims with the confidence of someone who's never met a segmentation fault. But the programming gods have other plans. First comes the linker errors - those cryptic messages about undefined references that make you question your career choices. Then the final boss appears: runtime errors. Those sneaky bastards that pass all checks but crash your program when the client demos it. It's the circle of developer life - fix one problem, unlock three more challenging ones. Welcome to the job security plan.

The four stages of developer evolution, beautifully depicted as increasingly unhinged clown makeup: Stage 1: The innocent belief your code is "good and understandable" because your colleagues said so. Bless your heart. Stage 2: The realization that clean code belongs in textbooks, not production. In the real world, that pristine architecture just slows down delivery. Stage 3: The existential crisis when you discover those elegant abstractions you spent weeks on are worthless after the first requirement change. Stage 4: The final form - admitting you never formally studied programming while your codebase burns in the background. Yet somehow, the system still runs. And that's how we all end up maintaining legacy code written by circus performers.

The ultimate prank on a programmer's psyche! Imagine being haunted by a mysterious "STARTUP ERROR 54EDGT4" that doesn't exist in any documentation. Classic psychological warfare targeting a developer's compulsive need to fix errors. The beauty is in its simplicity—using a fake error code that looks legitimate enough to send someone down a debugging rabbit hole for weeks. It's like injecting a syntax error directly into someone's soul. The perfect crime since no amount of StackOverflow searching would ever yield results!

Content airstrike 0 minutes ago unvote root parent prev next - There are actually only two hard problems in computer science: 0) Cache invalidation 1) Naming things 5) Asynchronous callbacks 2) Off-by-one errors 3) Scope creep 6) Bounds checking

The race starts with programming languages competing like normal sea creatures. C is the speedy crab, Python's the squid, Java's the slow squid, and JavaScript's the spiky pufferfish just trying to keep up. But halfway through, everything goes to hell. The race transforms into runtime errors that completely derail your code. Segmentation Fault takes the lead (classic C behavior), followed by Python's IndentationError (forgot a space, did we?), Java's NullPointerException (as reliable as death and taxes), and JavaScript's "NPM install..." which is still running since you started the race. And that, friends, is why we call them race conditions. Your code runs fine until it suddenly doesn't, and the winner is always the error you least expected.

Content Game-Breaking Bug Fixed The game breaking "stuck on Hey" bug has been fixed. The glitch did not allow the player to proceed past the first message of any level. The cause of this is very interesting. We tried on many machines but were unable to replicate the bug. It seemed like it was affecting players at random. After looking through the discussion posts and reviews, I started to notice a pattern. All reviews and messages sent were from people that are from places that were not North America. So the question was: what's the difference between a American computer and a non-American computer? Well when you are texting a message in the game and pause for a moment and then delete we tell the game to pause for a certain amount of time. for example 1.7 seconds. But decimal separators en wikipedia.orai are different in different countries (ex: 1.7 vs 1,7). This caused the game to either error or wait for an absurd amount of time before proceeding. In short, countries using decimal commas caused the game to break whereas countries using decimal points did not. TL;DR: The game is fixed now! Please enjoy.