Have A Bit Of Trust

Content castservice stsiface alsstscreds elinepkgawsforecast elinepkgfaas ain.go:50:2: pp declared but not used jrm.buildstepfunction-deletedatasetgroup-8.8.1-2' setgroup-8.8.1-r272-4c6e9d.zip to s3:ssb-ingest-u parallel-forecasting 2 3 12 ?1 make bu -tags netgo -installsuffix netgo -o .build in-deletedatasetgroup-0.0.1-r272-f4c6e9d.zip .build

Content 038 034 085 096 037 038 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 051 053 054 055 056 057 058 059 105 106 107 108 109 110 112 118 114 115 118 119 120 121 122 123 194 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 199 struct cmahelp char omdname: struct ondarg list xondarglist: static struct endarg ondare. new (const char shortars, const char she lpstr) static woid andare. destroy (struct endarg pondarg: static int andarg. compare (const char credarg const p const struct ardarg const Create a new command help struct. struct cordhelp ondhelp new (const char sondhname) struet condhelp xpondhelp fo cal loc (1, sizeof (spondhelp)) ponchelp-cadhame fo strdup (fe -basenane (andhane)) ; penchelp-ondarg list omdare. list. new 0; return pomdhelp; She might not look the part, bistro a oman kal si but she's a hardcore STEM type. do a cocoa died reeds tend oceanara yoid endhelp destroy (struct enchelp pendheld) 841 6. din pose else fo fprintf (stderr, -f-15s Astr", pondars- longarg, pomdarg-helpstr); I ondarg. list iterate end; if (gui options) I char buff128); fo sprintf (buf, sizeof (buf). ("Try YAs - pomdhe lo-omdname) The nearly empty strings in the two functions if the forgat of the comand argument list alore is fo forintf (stderr, "Pass any following options to the UI.")): fo forint (Gtderr, st", buf); if (report bugs) 1 TRANS: No full fo forintf (stder the URL, could cause confusi Jugs at Astn"), BUG URL) . now Python, too. Create a new command arg

The eternal struggle of a desperate coder, captured in one image! On the left, we have LLMs promising to "help with programming questions" but won't actually insult you (how considerate). On the right, StackOverflow boasting it's "accurate" and "used by people who know what they're doing" while flexing knowledge of "even the most obscure languages." It's the perfect illustration of our coding dilemma: get polite, possibly hallucinated answers from an AI that treats you like a fragile child, or brave StackOverflow where your "simple question" will be closed as duplicate, marked as trivial, and someone will suggest you shouldn't be programming at all. Choose your poison!

Oh. My. GOD. The AUDACITY of C compilers!!! 😱 While normal compilers will SCREAM at you with 47 error messages for a missing semicolon, C compiler sees you dereferencing a NULL pointer and just goes "*(int*)0 = 0; GOOD LUCK" with a smug little wink. It's like handing a toddler scissors and saying "have fun storming the castle!" Pure CHAOS ENERGY. Your program is about to crash so spectacularly that NASA will detect the explosion from space, but C compiler's just like "not my problem, sweetie! 💅" This is why C programmers wake up with cold sweats at 2am wondering if they've accidentally created a time bomb.

Content me sitting beside that one senior developer who always helps me with the bugs made with mematic ProdrammerHumor.io

The eternal gap between developer perception and user reality. Developers proudly declare "the interface is so intuitive it needs no documentation" while users are literally trying to eat the product. Nothing says "intuitive design" like watching someone attempt to consume your USB stick like it's a candy bar. The only documentation needed here is apparently "not edible, please insert into computer." Next time a product manager says "it's so user-friendly we don't need a manual," just silently email them this image.