Brave Programmer's Last Words

Content Sometimes my code is like this. Don't know, what it does. But i am scared to delete.

Someone wrote a method to count employees, but there's a tiny problem: it deletes ALL the employees from the database first, then counts how many are left. Spoiler alert: zero. Every single time after the first run, you're counting an empty table. The function technically works once—before it nukes your entire workforce into the digital void. The best part? They're using using statements for proper resource disposal, so at least the database connection is being cleaned up responsibly while the employee data gets yeeted into oblivion. Priorities, right? Pro tip: maybe fetch the count BEFORE running DELETE FROM. Or better yet, don't run DELETE FROM at all when you just want to count rows. That's what SELECT COUNT(*) is for. Your HR department will thank you.

Content When you debug for 2 hours but realize you started the unedited build the whole time Bro, I'm straight-up not having a good time.

Classic edge case thinking that would make any programmer proud. While the rest of humanity is stuck in the swim-run dichotomy, this genius is exploiting the system's unhandled exception: sharks with bicycles. This is precisely how developers approach problems—finding the absurd logical loophole that technically satisfies requirements while completely missing the point. It's the same energy as responding to "make this function more efficient" by deleting all the error handling.

Content When you get frustrated with fixing a bug, so you decide to work on an unrelated issue instead and when you go back to the original bug, it is fixed. V A 772 C 2Ar sin cOs 300 45 60 1 2 12 2 NIS NIH tan 7 wSi 2x 60 30 XV3 V tr tan (6) sin xdx -cos C 10 dx tgxC COS' 2 X tgxdx -In cos x X Inig sinx dx -arcig dx -In 8rad ax bx 6 0 b ax 725 0 b? - 4ac

When a 500 error hits, it's like watching the Hunger Games of software development. Frontend swears the API call was perfect, Backend insists their code is flawless, and DevOps is just standing there like "my infrastructure is pristine, thank you very much." Nobody wants to be the one who broke production, so naturally everyone points fingers in a beautiful circle of denial. Spoiler alert: it's probably a missing environment variable that nobody documented because documentation is for people who have time, which is nobody.