Aggressively Wrong

Content Storing JSON in a SQL Database

Content First name Last name Ishan Rakshit You used a bad word: shit. Please clean up the language and try again.

Content URUG INTERNE BANGE LUNANI LIMITED MySQl Hand Wash Sea Blue Fight 99.9 Germs Anti-Bacterial Liquid Soap 225 ml

Ah, the eternal dev dream: "Can AI just handle all this data conversion crap so I don't have to?" Meanwhile, every developer who's spent weeks building custom parsers for legacy government PDFs is quietly sobbing in the corner. The real treasury isn't money—it's the sanity we lost converting Excel to JSON. Pro tip: if you want to feel true pain, try parsing a PDF that was originally a scanned document from 1997 that someone converted to Word and then back to PDF again.

Staring at two buttons labeled "userId" and "user_id" is like choosing between two identical bombs where only one won't explode your database. The cold sweat begins as you realize you've been inconsistent with naming conventions across your entire codebase for the last 5 years, and now you need to join these tables. Nothing like the sheer panic of wondering if you used camelCase or snake_case in that legacy module nobody's touched since 2018. Pro tip: standardize your naming conventions before you have 300,000 lines of technical debt and a drinking problem.

Ah yes, the Y10K problem - the sequel nobody asked for! Future devs will be sobbing in their space pods because some genius in 2023 thought "four digits ought to be enough for anybody." Imagine having to refactor billions of lines of legacy code across the galaxy because nobody considered humans might still be writing terrible code 8,000 years from now. The exhausted expression says it all - "I could've been a space poet, but instead I'm patching date formats on Martian ATMs." History repeats itself, just with more digits.