I Love Cpp Lambda One-Liners

Behold the C++ developer in their natural habitat: manually managing memory while flexing on "easier" languages. These magnificent creatures believe that if you're not wrestling with pointers and segmentation faults before breakfast, you're not really programming. They've built biceps from carrying the weight of all those header files and abs from tensing up every time they forget to delete what they malloc'd. Modern languages with garbage collection? That's for the weak. Real programmers prefer their languages like they prefer their coffee—unnecessarily complex and likely to keep you up at night debugging.

C/C++ is like that horror movie villain who keeps coming back no matter how many times you think they're dead. For decades, newer languages have shown up with their fancy garbage collection and memory safety, smugly declaring "this will kill C/C++." Meanwhile, C/C++ is just chilling at its own funeral, pointing at itself and grinning because it knows it'll still be running critical infrastructure when all these trendy languages are long forgotten. The language literally predates the internet and yet somehow still powers it. Try replacing those low-level drivers and operating systems with your shiny new language... I'll wait.

Welcome to C++, where arrays decay to pointers faster than your career expectations after reading legacy code. Someone just discovered that when you pass an array to a function, it immediately forgets its own size and becomes a humble pointer. No size information, no bounds checking, just raw pointer energy. So now you're stuck passing array sizes as separate parameters like it's 1972. Meanwhile, Python devs are over there with their .length property, sipping lattes, while C# folks have their nice Array.Length . But here you are, manually tracking array sizes like some kind of memory accountant. The "C with classes" nickname hits different when you realize Bjarne Stroustrup gave us templates, RAII, and move semantics, but somehow we're still manually babysitting array bounds in 2025. At least we have std::vector and std::array now... if you can convince your team to stop writing C code in .cpp files.

The bravado of developers who claim they "fear no API" only to cower in terror at the sight of Vulkan is just *chef's kiss*. For the uninitiated, Vulkan is the low-level graphics API that makes even seasoned graphics programmers wake up in cold sweats. It's like saying "I'm great at assembling IKEA furniture" and then being handed the blueprints to build the actual IKEA store from scratch. The documentation alone is thicker than a computer science textbook, and the error messages might as well be written in ancient Sumerian. Meanwhile, OpenGL (referenced in the title) is like the friendly neighborhood graphics API that suddenly looks like a cuddly kitten in comparison.

The left side shows all the ridiculous string types C++ developers have to deal with: str , String , OsStr , OsString , Path , PathBuf , Vec<u8> , &u8 , CString , CStr ... while the right side shows the elegant simplicity of just using char[] . It's like bringing a Swiss Army knife to a gunfight when all you needed was a bullet. The string handling complexity in modern languages vs. the old-school C approach is programming's version of "why use many word when few word do trick?"

When you ask for a 32-bit integer but the judge gives you a signed one. That ~32,768 years sentence is suspiciously close to 2^15, which is exactly what happens when you overflow a signed 16-bit integer. The criminal probably wanted an unsigned int that goes up to 65,535, but instead got the negative range too. Classic rookie mistake. Should've specified the data type in the plea bargain.