The Truth About Web Development

Content I have built the same project in multiple languages. What's the project Hello World

Getting assigned to maintain a legacy codebase is like being sent to war. The first time, you're terrified. The second time? You're a battle-hardened veteran who knows exactly what horrors await: no documentation, variable names like "x1" and "temp2", nested if statements 47 levels deep, and comments in three different languages—none of which you speak. You've already debugged code where the original developer left a comment saying "I'm sorry" with no further explanation. You've seen things. You've refactored functions that were literally just one 800-line switch statement. At this point, you don't even flinch when you find out the "database layer" is actually just string concatenation with zero sanitization. The resignation in those eyes says it all. This is fine. Everything is fine.

Content Incorrect Question 5 What is the output of the following code? x 5 x 1 print(x) 1 5 6 An error occurs

Content NAS (OLD) Translation Guide What Progammers Sav What Progammers Mean Horrible hack Horrible hack that I didn't write Horrible hack that I wrote workaraound There are buas in vour code There are bugs in my code it has a few issues ODScure Someone else's code doesn't have comments call ocumen and My code doesn't have comments That's why it's an awesome It's my favorite language and it's really easy to lanquage do something in it You're thinking in the It's my favourite language and it's really hard wrong mindset to do something in it I can read this Perl script I wrote this Perl script I can't read this Perl script I didn't write this Perl script Bad structure Someone else's code is badly organised Complex structure Bug My code is badly organised The absence of a feature I like The absence of a feature I don't like Out of scope Clean solution It works and I understand it We need to rewrite it It works but I don't understand it emacs is better than vi vi is better than emacs It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war IMHO You are wrong Legacy code It works, but no one knows how XCquitESCESCC I don't know how to quit vi Suboptimal implementation The worst errors ever inflicted on humankind That can't be done It can be done, but it's boring and I don't want to do it No problem, people do this You might be the most idiotic person I've ever all the time. It's an easy fix. encountered Put that bug in the backlog with low priority Let's agree nobody ever mentions it again and ppl who do, will be shot These test environments are too brittle Works on my machine. Have you tried restarting it? Proof-of-Concept What I wrote Perfect solution How Sales Marketing are promoting it DEI

Content A GENERATION OF PEOPLE CAN'T DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN WEBDEV AND SOFTWARE DEV CHANGE MY MIND

Content Why buy more RAM when you can just add another swap file? 166.0 211 47.3 Mem SwpI 31111158.9 6CIl 45.0 91111166.5 4111111160.1 7C 43.3 14.8 63.2 811 47.1 11111 38.8 011111101111111111111153.8662. 7G 511G1021G PID USER 3921466 postgres 2678 user PRI NI VIRT RES SHR S CPU MEM TIME Command 30 10 862G 18.7G 29388 R 97.8 29.2 72h32:35 postgres 20 0 6857M 319M 156M S 0.0 0.5 3h09:38 usrbin, FiHelp F2Setup F3SearchFUFilterF5Tree F6SortByFTNice -FNice F9Kill NAME TYPE devsda3 swapfile file swapfile2 file SIZE USED PRIO partition 321.4G 321.4G -2 400G 142.4G -3 300G -4 My SQL query has been running for over 80 hours and I am not letting the OOM killer reap it after all this time.