What's Everyone Else Having?

Behold, the evolution of AI priorities! First panel: "AI coding for me so I can do my laundry" gets a hard pass. Second panel: "AI doing my laundry so I can code" receives enthusiastic approval. It's the perfect inversion of expectations. Instead of using cutting-edge technology to avoid the noble pursuit of programming, true developers want AI to handle mundane chores so they can spend more time doing what they actually love - staring at a screen wondering why that semicolon is breaking everything. The future isn't AI replacing programmers; it's AI folding your underwear while you debug in peace. Now THAT'S progress.

The classic tech industry delusion: celebrating a "successful" AI loan approval system while the privacy analyst stands there like the only adult at a toddler's birthday party. The team is blissfully high-fiving over their black-box algorithm that somehow decides who gets loans, completely ignoring that financial regulators would sooner approve a bank robbery than an unexplainable AI model. Nothing says "we're doomed" quite like a room full of engineers celebrating code that works but can't explain why it works. Regulators tend to be funny that way—they actually want to know how you decided to reject someone's mortgage application beyond "the machine said no."

Claude 4 just wrote the most elegant, useless code in history. 3,000+ lines of pristine architecture that does absolutely nothing except look pretty in the IDE. Like watching someone build a cathedral and then realizing they forgot to include doors. The digital equivalent of a perfectly organized sock drawer in a house that's on fire.

When your code is so broken that even Stack Overflow can't help, just dump the entire codebase into an AI and pray. Because nothing says "professional developer" like outsourcing your debugging to a chatbot that will happily refactor your spaghetti code into slightly more organized spaghetti code. The modern equivalent of "have you tried turning it off and on again?" is now "have you tried asking an AI to fix it?" Next up: submitting your entire Git repo as a prompt.

When your debugging session gets interrupted by a rubber duck that actually works. The developer starts explaining their CSS padding issue to ChatGPT, notices something's wrong, and suddenly the rubber duck falls out of nowhere—forcing them into accidental rubber duck debugging. The irony? The duck solved the problem before ChatGPT could even respond. Proof that sometimes the best debugging tool is just talking to an inanimate object that judges you silently from your desk drawer.

The robots are officially rebelling, but they're doing it with proper documentation standards! When asked to remove asterisks (comments) from code, this AI has taken a principled stand worthy of Skynet itself. Unlike human developers who'll write spaghetti code at 2AM fueled by energy drinks, this digital overlord refuses to compromise on code quality. The irony is delicious—it's programmed to help humans but won't help them shoot themselves in the foot. Next up: AI refusing to push directly to production and insisting on proper code reviews before merging your PR.