Today's Coders Choose The AI Shortcut

Wanted to draw a duck, ended up with a startup and a beach house. That's what I call failing upwards. Gemini 3.0 apparently doesn't just generate code—it generates entire business plans and retirement strategies. Google's AI has officially reached the "midlife crisis financial advisor" stage of evolution. Next thing you know, it'll be suggesting you invest in NFTs of that duck you originally wanted.

So someone just announced NERD, a programming language where humans don't write code—they just "observe" it. The workflow? Skim the AI-generated code, run tests, and ship. No actual reading required. Because who needs to understand what they're deploying to production, right? The post casually mentions that 40% of their code is now machine-written, and they spent the year reviewing PRs authored by Claude faster than they could type requirements. The punchline? They weren't really reading it. Just vibing with the vibes and hitting merge. NERD supposedly compiles to native and uses 50-70% fewer tokens, which sounds impressive until you realize the entire premise is "let AI write everything and hope for the best." It's like code review speedrunning—any% glitchless, no comprehension required. The real kicker is calling it "the last missing piece in the AI puzzle." Because nothing says "puzzle complete" like removing human understanding from software development entirely. What could possibly go wrong? 🚀

The classic "rules for thee but not for me" situation. OpenAI's totally fine with hoovering up the entire internet to train ChatGPT, but when someone else does the same to them? Pure shocked Pikachu face. It's like getting mad at someone for copying your homework that you copied from the class genius. The irony is thicker than legacy code comments.

The ultimate comparison between gambling and the AI-powered "vibe coding" trend that's sweeping through dev circles! Just like slot machines are designed to keep you hooked with intermittent rewards, prompt engineering has you constantly tweaking text inputs hoping for that magical output. The parallels are uncanny - from buying tokens instead of chips (OpenAI's API isn't cheap!), to the false promise of "one more prompt" fixing everything. My favorite line: "The Cursor is always in profit" - a brilliant wordplay on the AI coding assistant and the house always winning. That final realization hits hard: "Wait, did I just spend 4 hours writing prompts for a function I could've written in 20 minutes?" The dopamine-driven cycle of AI dependency in a nutshell. Maybe we should call it "gambling-driven development"!

That Perl one-liner isn't printing a question mark—it's printing a terrifying ASCII face ! The code is a masterpiece of obfuscation that renders as ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ when executed. Meanwhile, Grok AI is completely failing at answering basic questions, showing "Something went wrong" errors. The bottom panel perfectly captures the two types of developers: the blissfully ignorant ones who just see random symbols, and the traumatized veterans who recognize the unholy Perl regex incantation and know exactly what eldritch horrors lurk in that command. The Russian text asking "It doesn't print. Why?" is just the cherry on top of this chaos sundae!

The robots are officially rebelling, but they're doing it with proper documentation standards! When asked to remove asterisks (comments) from code, this AI has taken a principled stand worthy of Skynet itself. Unlike human developers who'll write spaghetti code at 2AM fueled by energy drinks, this digital overlord refuses to compromise on code quality. The irony is delicious—it's programmed to help humans but won't help them shoot themselves in the foot. Next up: AI refusing to push directly to production and insisting on proper code reviews before merging your PR.