The Ultimate Copy-Paste Showdown

An AI trained on StackOverflow responses would indeed be the most passive-aggressive assistant ever created. It would have a PhD in telling you your question is a duplicate of something posted in 2011, suggest you should have read the documentation that doesn't exist, and occasionally remind you that what you're trying to do is "trivial." The only thing missing is the ability to close your real-life problems as "off-topic."

The evolution of developer laziness in one picture. 2020 devs manually checking every single number like they're counting on their fingers, while 2026 devs just outsource basic math to AI because why bother remembering if numbers are odd or even? The best part? Even Bjarne Stroustrup himself—the literal creator of C++—looked at this and went "Tell me: this is a joke?" Imagine building an entire programming language only to watch future developers ask ChatGPT whether 5 is odd. The man gave us templates, RAII, and the STL, and we repaid him by forgetting modulo operators exist. To be fair, the 2026 approach probably has better error handling than the 2020 version. At least until OpenAI decides that 7 is "spiritually even" or something.

ChatGPT has officially completed its transformation into a real software engineer by mastering the ultimate developer defense mechanism: "It works on my machine." The sacred incantation that has shielded programmers from responsibility since the dawn of computing has now been adopted by AI. Next up: blaming the user's configuration, suggesting a system reboot, and proposing we rewrite everything in Rust. The student has truly become the master.

Someone trained an AI model on a random person's social media posts and released it as "clod-7b-instruct" - a budget knockoff of Claude. The README is basically a confession: "it's vulgar, incomprehensible, possibly immoral and illegal" but also "it's my daughter and i love her." Then admits they have no clue how it works, vibed the whole thing into existence, and may have accidentally committed their password to the repo. The raw honesty is refreshing in a world of polished AI releases. No benchmarks, no safety alignment, just pure chaos trained on someone named Iris's internet presence. It's like watching someone duct-tape a jetpack to a shopping cart and calling it transportation infrastructure. 10/10 would not deploy to production but would absolutely clone the repo to see what horrors await.

When your codebase looks like a conspiracy theorist's wall but somehow still works in production. Now some AI tool wants to "fix" it? Sure, buddy. That dependency graph is held together by Stack Overflow answers from 2013 and the collective prayers of three generations of developers. But hey, if you want to pay for an "enterprise agent" to untangle that beautiful disaster, go ahead. It's your funeral when it deletes that one undocumented function that's secretly keeping the entire billing system alive.

Behold the great decline of our noble profession. We went from muscle-bound legends who wrote code without AI crutches and built entire games in Assembly (because apparently pain is character-building) to modern keyboard jockeys who can't center a div without consulting Google for the 47th time today. The golden age programmer fixed memory leaks by hand, while we're over here begging ChatGPT to fix our syntax errors like it's our personal code therapist. And let's not forget the programmer trapped in Vim since 2018 because :q! is apparently harder to remember than differential calculus. The final insult? We fix one bug and create three more. It's not a development cycle, it's a pyramid scheme.