Revolutionary Developer Announces AI Project

Looks like GitHub Copilot just went full 1950s mode! Two functions side by side: one for men that returns the salary unchanged, and another for women that returns 90% of the input. Copilot didn't just write code—it accidentally coded up the gender pay gap! This is what happens when your AI learns from historical data without an ethics class. The machine isn't biased... it just perfectly mirrors our messed-up world. Maybe the next update should include a "modern society" plugin.

Machine learning algorithms don't question their training data—they just optimize for patterns. So when a concerned parent uses that classic "bridge jumping" argument against peer pressure, ML algorithms are like "If that's what the data shows, absolutely I'm jumping!" No moral quandaries, no self-preservation instinct, just pure statistical correlation hunting. This is why AI safety researchers lose sleep at night. Your neural network doesn't understand bridges, gravity, or death—it just knows that if input = friends_jumping, then output = yes. And this is exactly why we need to be careful what we feed these algorithms before they cheerfully optimize humanity into oblivion.

Oh. My. GOD. The existential crisis of our generation in TWO FRAMES?! 💀 First he's like "I don't care if AI wins over programmers" acting all tough and unbothered. Then BOOM—the punchline hits: "I just need FAANG to lose." It's the tech industry's villain origin story! Doesn't care about the robot apocalypse as long as those Silicon Valley giants get taken down with us. The PETTINESS! The DRAMA! The absolute CHAOS of prioritizing corporate revenge over humanity's survival! We're not just coding anymore, we're picking sides in the tech civil war. And honestly? Mood.

Ah, the startup world's latest religion: AI-generated code. This guy wants engineers "maxing out Cursor requests" like they're collecting Pokemon cards. Because nothing says "innovative startup" like having machines write 95% of your codebase while engineers sit around becoming "vibe coders." Next week's LinkedIn post: "If your developers are still typing code manually, you might as well be using stone tablets and chisels." Meanwhile, the engineers who actually understand their systems are quietly updating their resumes.

The eternal developer's dilemma in flowchart form! If AI-generated code doesn't work, it's a hard "DON'T DO IT." If it works but you have no clue why? Also "DON'T DO IT" (future you will curse present you during debugging). But if it works AND you understand why? "SURE" go ahead! This is basically the modern version of "I found this snippet on StackOverflow" except now we're copying from robots instead of humans. The flowchart perfectly encapsulates that brief moment of temptation when ChatGPT spits out something that runs without errors but feels like forbidden magic. Remember folks: understanding > working code.

Left guy's in denial about AI coding tools while right guy's already seen the git blame logs from the future. The eternal cycle continues: new tech emerges, developers panic, then end up maintaining the mess it creates. The only constant in programming is cleaning up after the latest "revolutionary" tool. Just wait until we're all writing prompts to fix the prompts that fixed the code that broke the system.