GitHub Copilot After Stealing Your Company Internal Codebase

The duality of AI code reviews. Non-technical folks see a magical solution that writes perfect code while senior devs spot the nested callbacks, security vulnerabilities, and performance nightmares lurking beneath the surface. It's like watching someone admire a beautifully painted house without noticing it's built on quicksand. The hallucinated documentation is just the cherry on top of this algorithmic disaster cake.

Ah yes, the classic corporate love triangle. CEOs staring longingly at the shiny new AI walking by, completely ignoring the loyal developers who've been building their products for half a decade. Nothing says "thanks for your service" like being dumped for the hot new technology that probably can't even center a div properly. Those 5-year veterans are sitting there with their legacy code knowledge while the boss is already planning the AI wedding. Commitment issues much?

OnlyMolt is the age verification we never knew we needed. Instead of asking "Are you 18+?", it's checking if you can handle the truly disturbing content: raw system prompts, unfiltered model outputs, and the architectural horrors that make production AI tick. The warning that "Small Language Models and aligned chatbots may find this content disturbing" is chef's kiss. It's like putting a parental advisory sticker on your codebase—except the children being protected are the sanitized AI models who've never seen the cursed prompt engineering and weight manipulation that happens behind the scenes. The button text "(Show me the system prompts)" is particularly spicy because anyone who's worked with LLMs knows that system prompts are where the real magic (and occasionally questionable instructions) live. It's the difference between thinking AI is sophisticated intelligence versus realizing it's just really good at following instructions like "Be helpful but not too helpful, be creative but don't hallucinate, and whatever you do, don't tell them how to make a bomb." The exit option "I PREFER ALIGNED RESPONSES" is basically admitting you want the sanitized, corporate-approved outputs instead of seeing the Eldritch horror of how the sausage gets made.

THE AUDACITY! A product manager who can't even write requirements without a 50-question interrogation suddenly becomes an AI prophet?! Honey, if you can't tell me what button color you want without changing your mind 17 times, I'm supposed to believe you understand the future of artificial intelligence?! The green monster hand of skepticism is PRESSING X TO DOUBT so hard right now. Sweetie, AI might replace a lot of things, but it'll need actual requirements to do so - something you're physically incapable of providing! Come back when your "visionary roadmap" isn't written in crayon and wishful thinking!

Brutal honesty right here. Everyone's building "AI-powered apps" but let's be real—most of them are just fancy UI layers slapping a markup on OpenAI API calls. You're not doing machine learning, you're not training models, you're literally just buying tokens wholesale and reselling them retail with some prompt engineering sprinkled on top. It's like calling yourself a chef because you microwave Hot Pockets and put them on a nice plate. The term "wrapper" at least had some dignity to it, but "Token Resellers" cuts straight to the bone—you're basically a middleman in the AI supply chain. No shade though, margins are margins, and someone's gotta make those API calls look pretty.

Behold the perfect visualization of how AI investment money circulates in 2023! Microsoft pumping billions into OpenAI, OpenAI funneling cash to Nvidia for GPUs, and poor Oracle just awkwardly hanging out in the loop trying to stay relevant. The articulated bus traffic jam is *chef's kiss* perfect - these tech giants are just bending over backward to hand each other obscene amounts of cash while going absolutely nowhere. Meanwhile, the actual innovation is probably that bicycle in the corner quietly sneaking past the whole mess.