Basically Microsoft Copilot

Google's AI Overview just confidently explained that matrix multiplication "is not a problem in P" (polynomial time), which is... hilariously wrong. Matrix multiplication is literally IN the P complexity class because it can be solved in polynomial time. The AI confused "not being in P" with "not being solvable in optimal polynomial time for all cases" or something equally nonsensical. This is like saying "driving to work is not a problem you can solve by driving" – technically uses the right words, but the logic is completely backwards. The AI hallucinated its way through computational complexity theory and served it up with the confidence of a junior dev who just discovered Big O notation yesterday. And this, folks, is why you don't trust AI to teach you computer science fundamentals. It'll gaslight you into thinking basic polynomial-time operations are unsolvable mysteries while sounding incredibly authoritative about it.

Nvidia's AI assistant just pulled the classic "have you tried upgrading to a better GPU?" move on someone who already owns their top-tier RTX 5090 . This is like a doctor recommending heart surgery to a patient with an artificial heart they installed last week. The irony is absolutely delicious—Nvidia's own tool can't recognize its flagship product and instead tries to upsell the very hardware that's already powering the conversation. It's the GPU equivalent of "Did you try turning it off and on again?" except it costs $2000.

So we've reached the point where "coders" who can't function without AI assistance are being told they have no business shipping software. The brutal honesty here is refreshing. It's like watching someone realize their entire skillset is just being really good at prompting ChatGPT. The vibe shift is real. We went from "AI will replace all programmers" to "if you need AI to write every line, you're not actually a programmer" faster than you can say "stack overflow copy-paste." Sure, AI is a tool—but if you can't debug, architect, or understand what the AI just generated, you're basically a glorified middleman between a language model and production. Tony Stark energy: "Learn the fundamentals or get out of my codebase."

Remember when programmers were basically coding demigods who could bend computers to their will? Now we're just sad creatures Googling "how to center div" for the 500th time and begging AI to fix our mistakes. The golden age programmer wrote code without StackOverflow, crafted entire games in Assembly (you know, that language that makes you want to cry), manually fixed memory leaks with pointers, and literally hand-coded the software that put humans on the freaking moon. Meanwhile, modern programmers are trapped in Vim wondering why :q doesn't work, fixing one bug only to create three more like some kind of hydra nightmare, and asking ChatGPT to solve problems we should probably understand ourselves. The decline is real, folks. But hey, at least we have dark mode now.

The eternal struggle with AI coding assistants. Claude keeps telling me my broken code is "absolutely right" while my application crashes and burns in the background. It's like having that one junior dev who confidently nods along to everything you say but has no idea what's happening. The real debugging begins when you have to figure out if you're the problem or if Claude is gaslighting you into believing your spaghetti code is a masterpiece.

The AUDACITY of modern development! While the rest of us are drowning in Stack Overflow tabs and questioning our career choices, "vibe coders" are out here summoning AI agents with mystical cauldrons and threatening them with PUNISHMENT if they don't fix bugs! 💀 It's giving "I don't debug, I just intimidate my code until it works" energy. The AI agent in that cauldron is probably thinking "I didn't get trained on 10 trillion parameters for THIS kind of toxic workplace environment!" Meanwhile, the rest of us are manually fixing array indices like PEASANTS.