Based On True Incidents

The ultimate AI coding assistant betrayal! Someone's excited about their new AI coding tool "Cursor" only to hit the dreaded 800 line limit after just one hour of letting the AI cook. The tool basically said "learn to code, noob" when they asked it to keep generating. It's like ordering a pizza only to have the delivery guy show up with just the crust and toppings, then hand you a recipe for the sauce with a note saying "making it yourself ensures you understand Italian cuisine." Thanks for nothing! The irony of using an AI tool specifically to avoid coding, only to be told you should learn coding instead... peak 2024 energy right there.

HONEY, PLEASE! Slapping an "AI" label on basic conditional logic is the tech equivalent of putting a Ferrari badge on your 1998 Toyota Corolla! 💅 The ABSOLUTE DRAMA of Uber claiming they're using "artificial intelligence" when they're literally just checking *if drunk_time == true && location == bar && app_fumbling > 30sec*. I. CAN'T. EVEN. 🙄 The tech industry's relationship with the term "AI" is more toxic than my ex's Instagram stories. Just because you can write an if-statement doesn't mean you've created HAL 9000, DARLING!

That moment when your revolutionary AI startup's tech stack is just a fancy wrapper around someone else's API. The shocked cat perfectly captures the existential crisis of realizing you're not building the future—you're just paying OpenAI's bills while adding a markup for your investors. But hey, that Series A funding hit your bank account, so who's really winning here?

The future of AI is looking grim for us code monkeys! In this dark comedy, a programmer asks an AI superintelligence if humans will still have coding jobs after the robot takeover. The AI confidently claims there are "things humans do that robots simply can't"... only for the final panels to reveal programmers kept in a zoo exhibit called "Coder-Town" where visitors marvel at the pathetic human trying to fix its own syntax errors. The real knife-twist? We're not even respected colleagues—we're just adorable pets that deserve corn when we struggle with bugs we created. This is basically our collective nightmare about GitHub Copilot's final form.

The eternal developer's dilemma in flowchart form! If AI-generated code doesn't work, it's a hard "DON'T DO IT." If it works but you have no clue why? Also "DON'T DO IT" (future you will curse present you during debugging). But if it works AND you understand why? "SURE" go ahead! This is basically the modern version of "I found this snippet on StackOverflow" except now we're copying from robots instead of humans. The flowchart perfectly encapsulates that brief moment of temptation when ChatGPT spits out something that runs without errors but feels like forbidden magic. Remember folks: understanding > working code.

THE ABSOLUTE AUDACITY of comparing AI prompt engineering to gambling is SENDING ME! 💀 Both involve throwing money at a system you barely understand, desperately hoping for that magical outcome while the house (or cursor) laughs all the way to the bank. You're either wasting time tweaking slot strategies or perfecting prompts for a function that could've been written in 20 minutes. And that last row? DEVASTATING TRUTH. Nothing says "professional developer" like spending 4 hours crafting the perfect prompt only to realize you've just been playing the world's nerdiest slot machine. The difference? At least gamblers KNOW they're gambling!