Biting The Hand That Feeds Your Paycheck

The classic tale of developer overengineering, brought to you by "pingusVM" - a project that died before it lived. Nothing screams "I've been coding too long" like deciding your VM needs both stack AND register-based architecture when one would've done just fine. Meanwhile, WebAssembly is sitting there like "been there, solved that" while our ambitious dev realizes they've reinvented a square wheel. The best projects are the ones you abandon after that 2AM moment of clarity when you realize you're competing with an entire team at Google. But hey, at least they got a funny name out of it. RIP pingusVM (2023-2023) - we hardly knew ye.

Formal Bugs Bunny just murdered an entire generation of developers who can't code without their AI bestie. HTTP 429 is the digital equivalent of "sorry, you've asked for too much help today." The irony of wishing "vibe coders" a rate limit error is pure evil genius – like watching someone's IDE crash right before a demo. Those who actually know how to solve problems without pasting entire error messages into ChatGPT are sitting back with popcorn, watching the chaos unfold.

Ah yes, the classic startup "opportunity" where you can trade actual money for the possibility of future money! The red flag is so big it could guide ships through fog. Translation: "We can't afford developers but we're pretty sure our idea is the next Facebook. Trust us, bro." Zero applicants after three weeks? Shocking! Almost as if professional developers enjoy paying rent and buying food. The audacity of calling unpaid work a "stake in our future" instead of what it really is—gambling with your time.

The ultimate JavaScript trivia nightmare! Every single option here is a trick question showcasing JavaScript's bizarre type coercion and equality rules: A: typeof null === 'object' is actually TRUE - a notorious JS bug that's been around since the beginning. Null isn't an object, but returns 'object' when typeof'd. B: Math.min() > Math.max() is TRUE too! Without arguments, Math.min() returns Infinity while Math.max() returns -Infinity. C: NaN === NaN is FALSE - the only value in JavaScript that isn't equal to itself! D: 0 == "" is TRUE because JavaScript type coercion converts empty strings to 0. The contestant's face says it all - the answer is C, but knowing JavaScript, you'd question your entire programming career before answering.

THE ABSOLUTE HORROR of ordering pizza as a developer! Papa John's out here with their "{NAME}" and "{userEmail}" placeholders just raw-dogging it in production! 😱 The eternal struggle between hunger and witnessing someone's template variables that never got replaced. Meanwhile that little loading spinner is probably making a desperate API call to nowhere because SOMEONE FORGOT TO VALIDATE THE FORM DATA. The pizza might arrive, but my faith in their codebase certainly won't. And don't get me started on "Loading pick up info..." – honey, you can't pick up what your variables couldn't put down! 💅

That moment when the client shows off their new 86-inch ultra-wide monitor and your responsive design sweats nervously in the background. Five years of media queries and you still didn't prepare for THIS edge case. Tomorrow's standup will be fun: "So yeah, turns out our beautiful UI looks like a stretched piece of gum on the CEO's new ridiculous display." The best part? They'll blame the framework, not the absurdity of coding for every possible screen dimension known to mankind.