Why Make It Complicated?

Content NYPD TYPESCRIPT CHOOSING ESLINT AS DEVDEPENDENCY ESLINT CHOOSING TYPESCRIPT AS DEVDEPENDENGY

Staring at your screen for 45 minutes, questioning your entire career choice because your function isn't returning anything... only to realize you never actually called it. Just another Tuesday in the life of a developer. The difference between rage and shame is just one missing parenthesis pair () .

The aristocracy of web development has arrived! TypeScript developers looking down their noses at JavaScript peasants with that perfect mix of pity and disgust. Nothing says "I'm better than you" quite like strong typing and compile-time error checking. Meanwhile, JavaScript developers are out there living dangerously with their undefined is not a function errors, like savages without powdered wigs. The TypeScript nobility wouldn't dare touch code that doesn't explicitly declare its intentions - how barbaric!

First panel: JavaScript behaving like a normal language where string + string = concatenated string. Second panel: JavaScript on crack where '2'+'2' = 100 and "Hello"+2 = "llo". The true horror of JS type coercion in its natural habitat. What kind of sadistic language designer thought "yes, let's make + sometimes concatenate and sometimes convert strings to numbers based on my mood today"? This is why senior devs have that thousand-yard stare during code reviews.

While other languages are having a complete MELTDOWN because you dared to put a string, an integer, and a float in the same array, JavaScript is just vibing like a Greek philosopher contemplating the meaning of existence. "Mixed types? Sure bro, throw in a function and an object while you're at it. I literally don't care." JavaScript's dynamic typing is basically the programming equivalent of "live and let live" – no type checking, no judgment, just pure chaotic acceptance. Meanwhile, statically-typed languages are out here crying tears of blood because you tried to mix your data types like some kind of programming anarchist. JavaScript said "type safety is a social construct" and honestly? It's living its best life.

Content STOP DOING TYPESCRIPT TYPE CHECKING WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE TURING COMPLETE YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for data types other than STRING and NUMBER Want to check if your code will work? We have a tool for that: It is called "RUNNING IT" Types DON'T EXIST, it's all deleted by the transpiler "Yes, please abort my build because a type isn't correctly labeled as bivariant. Please paint my screen red because I didn't install typesreact" - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged LOOK at what Programmers have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the computers and frameworks we built for them (These are REAL types, made by REAL Programmers) nectedConponent React .ComponentclassPickconitc(OnitcOnitedefs.OnitefulParans. keyof ErrorHandli aMierationsA. B. MierateB. CI aMierations?A. B, C, MigrateC, D; Mierations3A. B. C. D. MigrateD. E1: MigrateEa Marat 0. InfersbleConne MigrationstAA Migrations15A Testonde kovof LocalStoraecivockso. A mapDispatch only (as a function) tro state a M. Thisnatchoronsi no state - (. TDispatchProos - 1. TOenProo as manState and mardisnatch (as a function): StateProps (1), TDispatchProos (), TOmProp as manState and aschicostch las a TDi spat chProos no state - 0. StateProps (). no dispatch (. TOmProo no state 1. TDispatchoron They have played us for absolute fools