There are two kinds of developers. Those who have broken production and those who are about to.

Content compiler: Error me: changes nothing, runs again. compiler

Programmers see a simple age calculation and immediately apply the most straightforward algorithm: current age minus the age difference. Meanwhile, testers are out here considering every edge case from relativistic time dilation to family affairs. This is why we can't ship on time. Devs think they're done after the happy path works, while QA is busy writing test cases for "what if your sister is secretly an astronaut experiencing time dilation" scenarios. And this, friends, is the eternal dance between developers and testers that's been keeping software barely functional since the dawn of computing.

Content Write code The tests fail Write more tests to narrow down the problem Write tests The tests fail Those tests pass The bug was in the test

Content Important 1-25 of 91 gave you access to the Production DB Jr. Dev I will do what I must. Results Messages (5000 row(s) affected)

Content FUGKZODIAG SIGNS 16 bits EAX AX 8 bits AH 8 bits AL General-purpose Registers EBX BX BH BL ECX CX CH CL EDX DX DH DL ESI EDI ESP (stack pointer) EBP (base pointer) 32 bits WHATS YOUR FAVORITE KOS REGISTER

Content Supabase supabase 2s Dev productivity hack 37 A few hours of trial and error can save you minutes of reading the documentation peni ProdrammerHumor.io