The Lion Does Not Concern Himself With Merely 2 Failing Tests

Content GOTTHE PRINCESS! HOW TO SAVE THE PRINCESS BY O toggl USING 8 PROGRAMMING Goon SquAD LANGUAGES YOU HAVE JAVASCRIPT YoU SPEND HOUrS PICKING LIBRARIES, SETTING UP NODE BUILDING A FRAME WORK FOR THE CASTLE. BY THE TIME YoUrE FiNIShEd wIth THE FRAME WORK, THE FORT HAS REEN ABANDONED AND THE PRINCESS MAST MOVED TO ANOTHER CASTLE YOU HAVE YOU HAVE A LIBRARY FOR A CASTLE A LIBRARY FOR THE PRINCESS - CHARGE! YOU RESCUE THE PRINCESS HER DOG, HER ENTIRE WARDROBE EVERYTHING SHE HAS EVER EATEN... FUCK - DID I FORGET NULL -TERMINATOR YOU HAVE C YOU SPEND HOURS TRYING TO EXPRESS THE ENTIRE RESCUE IN A SINGLE LING QUERY YOU GIVE UP AND GO TO STACKOVERFLOW TO HAVE JON SKEET RESCUE THE PRINCESS FOR YOU. YOU HAVE JAVA YOU QUICKLY DEPLOY THE RESCUE TO PRODUCTION YoU DISCOVER YoUvE LOADED TWO VERSIONS OF THE CASTLE BUT NO PRINCESS YOU HAVE LISP YOU HAVE Go WE DON'T SUPPORT FREEING CAPTURED PRINCESSES, WE ALREADY HAVE THESE FREE PRINCESSES IN THE STANDARD LIBR... ...WAIT, IS THIS THE PRINCESS FROM THE JAVA PANEL YOU HAVE PASCAL YOU DECLARE YOUR PRINCESS CASTLE RESCUE PLAN THEN YOU GO FOR A DRINK FORGET ABOUT THE IMPLEMENTATION YOU HAVE PHP YOU HAVE TO RESCUE THE PRINCESS... ... IN PHP... MART VIRKUS '16 ProarammerHumor.io toggl

Content JO Certainly! Here is a Python function that takes either the number 3 or the number 5 as input, and returns the other number: ( Copy code def getothernumber (n: int) - int: if n 3: return 5 elif n 5: return 3 else: raise ValueError ("Input must be either 3 or 5.") I'm sorry, by 'shorter' i meant without using 'if' clauses Certainly! Here is a version of the code that does not use any 'if' clauses: Copy code def getothernumber (n: int) - int: return 6 - n This code takes advantage of the fact that the input is always either 3 or 5, and that the sum of 3 and 5 is always 6. Therefore, if we subtract the

Content nasm: error at line 6540 me: my code is only 20 lines nasm: ProdrammerHumor.io

The five stages of code review grief, compressed into four panels. First, you're riding high on that dopamine rush when your code actually works. Next, you swagger into the senior dev's office like you've just solved P=NP. Then comes the inevitable soul-crushing "You did it wrong" feedback, followed by the final stage: complete existential collapse as you realize your approach was fundamentally flawed and those 8 hours of work were essentially a very educational waste of time. Classic senior dev move—they don't tell you HOW it's wrong, just that your entire existence as a programmer is questionable.

Content Interviewer: it says here you're extremely fast at maths, what's 3017? quantum computer: 47 Interviewer: that's not even close Me: yeah but it was quick

Ah, the mysterious phenomenon of code that spontaneously combusts overnight. You go home after a productive day, your code purring like a well-fed cat, only to return the next morning to find it's transformed into a dumpster fire that would make Chernobyl look like a minor inconvenience. The best part? You haven't changed a single line . It's as if your code decided to have an existential crisis at 3 AM and is now punishing you for leaving it alone in the dark. Seventeen errors? That's practically a cry for attention. Meanwhile, you're sitting there wondering if gremlins have infested your repository, or if Mercury is in retrograde for JavaScript specifically. The only logical explanation, of course, is that the universe simply hates developers on Mondays.