The Lion Does Not Concern Himself With Merely 2 Failing Tests

Ah, the ancient art of developer revenge. That guy who said "it's all in the documentation" before quitting? Yeah, he left you hieroglyphics. Nothing says "figure it out yourself" quite like documentation that requires a Rosetta Stone to decipher. The best part? He's probably sipping margaritas somewhere, giggling every time he imagines you staring at his "comprehensive notes" with that thousand-yard debug stare. This is why exit interviews should include a documentation sanity check and why we all secretly fear the phrase "Bob was the only one who understood that system."

Content Fixing compiler errors like

The AUDACITY of modern development! While the rest of us are drowning in Stack Overflow tabs and questioning our career choices, "vibe coders" are out here summoning AI agents with mystical cauldrons and threatening them with PUNISHMENT if they don't fix bugs! 💀 It's giving "I don't debug, I just intimidate my code until it works" energy. The AI agent in that cauldron is probably thinking "I didn't get trained on 10 trillion parameters for THIS kind of toxic workplace environment!" Meanwhile, the rest of us are manually fixing array indices like PEASANTS.

Content CtE nDort Expo LiX Please wait patiently for the failure of the system.

Content class Greeter constructor name, nameChangeable true this.name name this.nameChangeable nameChangeable sayHi console.log "He116, this.name) I changeName newName if newName. length was 0 console.error Name can't be empty! else if this.nameChangeable console.log The name was changed "to nevName? this.name newName else console.error Name can't be changed new Greeter "Bob" true sayHi (

Content FLEX ME APE Failing unit test IFailing unit test