My Attempt To Get Outsourced Colleague To Write Good Code

The pendulum of programmer self-esteem, accurately captured in metronome form. One minute you're solving impossible bugs and feeling like you've harnessed the secrets of the universe. Five minutes later your code breaks in production because you forgot a semicolon. The eternal cycle continues, tick-tock, from digital deity to complete disaster, with absolutely no middle ground whatsoever.

Content JS factorial.js ... 1 JavaScript expert: 2 No, you cannot use a single identifier in your code. 3 You will get multiple errors about name conflicts. 4 5 const factorial function factorial (factorial, factorial, factorial) 6 7 8 factorialfactorial, factorial:factorialfactorial. factorial? factorial.factorial--factorialfactorialfactorial(factorial):-factorial; 9 10 return factorial factorialfactorial (factorial); 11 12 13 console. log(factorial(...,,7)); 14 15 JavaScript: hold my beer. PROBLEMS OUTPUT DEBUG CONSOLE usrlocalbinnode factorial.js 5040 ProarammerHumor.io TERMINAL

Content This password is for my bank So the password should be as secure as possible 0 Longer passwords are generally more secure ThisPasswordHas21Char Yup Yup Makes sense to me Error: Password should have between 8 and 20 characters

Ah yes, the ancient debugging technique known as "comment-driven development." Why waste precious brain cells understanding complex logic when you can just play code whack-a-mole? Nothing says "senior developer" like systematically commenting out random chunks of code until your application mysteriously springs back to life. The best part? You'll never know what you actually fixed, preserving that delightful sense of mystery for the next poor soul who inherits your codebase. It's not a bug—it's a feature that keeps future developers employed!

Looking at that pill bottle labeled "Not caring about backward compatibility" while staring intensely at it? Guilty as charged. Nothing says "living on the edge" quite like pushing that shiny new update that breaks every legacy system in existence. Who needs stable APIs when you can have excitement ? Sure, the users with older systems might riot, but they should've upgraded five versions ago anyway. Their technical debt is not my emotional burden. That sweet, sweet feeling when you delete 200 lines of compatibility code and replace it with 10 lines of elegant modern syntax. Worth every angry support ticket.

Content How can I create a new file and fill it with 1 Gigabyte worth of random data? I need this to test some software. I would prefer to use dev random or devurandom. share improve this question 8,274 19 0 57 0 75 asked Mar 7'12 at 0:26 17 Open vi with vi -w randomfile and ask someone who's never seen vi to exit the program. ;) - Jun 8 '16 at 3:34