The Great Escape Key

Someone's job security strategy is absolutely chef's kiss . Instead of writing clean, maintainable code, they've created a function that always returns 2, labeled it as "job security," and then made two helper functions that literally copy memory addresses to change the return value. Nothing says "I'll never be fired" like writing code that only you understand and using memcpy() to overwrite function implementations instead of, you know, just changing the original function. Because why write one line of code when you can write twenty that require a hazmat suit to maintain? Bonus points for the "NEVER call this function" comments that scream "I'm the only one who knows which landmines not to step on." Pure evil genius at work here.

Hollywood would have you believe hackers are all chiseled jawlines in sleek environments, dramatically typing "ACCESS GRANTED" while staring intensely at someone. Meanwhile, actual hackers are just sleep-deprived cave dwellers surrounded by the archaeological layers of tech hoarding, surviving on energy drinks and pure spite, with enough ethernet cables to circle the equator twice. The only thing they're hacking is a path through their hardware graveyard to find that one specific adapter they swear they kept "just in case."

SWEET MOTHER OF LEGACY CODE! 😱 A Gordon Ramsay-style tech show would be the MOST SAVAGE THING EVER! Imagine him discovering your company is running Ubuntu 8.04 (released in 2008 and LONG dead) with not one but TWO backdoors AND a crypto miner stealing your electricity! That's like finding expired ingredients from the last decade AND rats in the kitchen! And owing $2 MILLION to AWS?! That's not technical debt, that's technical BANKRUPTCY! The cloud bill alone would make Gordon's veins pop out of his forehead while he screams "THIS INFRASTRUCTURE IS SO OLD IT REMEMBERS WHEN JAVASCRIPT WAS COOL THE FIRST TIME!"

The security admin proudly sets up branch protection requiring admin approval for all code changes. Meanwhile, the intern is confused about needing a +1 approval while the senior dev is like "lgtm, ship it" despite the code clearly containing an API key hardcoded in plain text with debugging logs printing credentials. Security theater at its finest - the branch is protected but the data sure isn't.

That's not a white dot, that's Cursor AI sharing your plaintext password file with every hacker on the planet. Nothing says "security professional" like storing credentials in a CSV file named "passwords.csv" and then asking about UI elements while exposing it. Somewhere, a security engineer just felt a disturbance in the force and doesn't know why.

The eternal comedy of our industry: Manager wants a feature for "authorized paying users" but tells dev to "implement authentication." Dev with actual security knowledge asks the critical question – authentication or authorization? – only to be met with blank stares and "There's a difference?" For the uninitiated (and apparently the manager): Authentication is proving you are who you say you are (login/password). Authorization is determining what you're allowed to do once identified. The final panel showing the desperate Google search is the universal developer coping mechanism after 10 years of explaining this distinction to people who'll forget it by the next sprint planning.