I Don't Want To Learn Rust

OH. MY. GOD. The absolute BETRAYAL! 😱 You're telling me this "revolutionary" Rust GUI framework is just JavaScript wearing a trench coat?! The AUDACITY! It's like ordering a fancy artisanal coffee and discovering it's just instant coffee with extra foam! Developers spent YEARS escaping JavaScript's chaos only to find it smuggled back in through the Rust basement window! This is the programming equivalent of finding out your vegan burger is actually 100% beef. TRUST ISSUES ACTIVATED! 💔

The eternal battle between programming languages in one perfect sumo match! The massive C and C++ community stands like an immovable mountain of legacy code and performance, while tiny Rust enthusiasts desperately try to push them over with their memory safety arguments. It's like watching your little cousin try to convince your stubborn uncle that his 40-year-old way of doing things might have some flaws. "But... but... we prevent segmentation faults at compile time!" Yeah, good luck with that, kiddo. The C/C++ devs just pat them on the head while continuing to manually manage memory like it's 1972.

Ah, the eternal Rust evangelism strike force and their undying optimism! The meme shows the slow descent into madness of someone waiting for C/C++ to finally die off. Starting in 2015: "Any day now!" By 2018: "Hmm, checking my watch, should be happening soon..." 2022: "I'll just lie down here in this field of broken promises." And finally 2025: "Just bury me with my memory-safe abstractions." Meanwhile, C++ is still running literally everything important in the world. Sorry Rustaceans, those 40-year-old codebases aren't rewriting themselves—no matter how many times you mention "fearless concurrency" at the company holiday party.

The C++ standard committee's forward-thinking approach to version naming is truly inspiring. By limiting the version string to just 5 characters, they've ensured we'll run out of space around the year 2098. It's basically Y2K but for people who think memory safety is overrated. Meanwhile, Rust developers are sitting in the corner, patiently waiting with their zero-cost abstractions and ownership model, knowing that time is on their side. Nothing says "legacy planning" quite like a 76-year migration timeline.

The C++ programmer's 3 AM nightmare in full display. First the Rust evangelists tell you your beloved language is "unsafe" and you need to switch. Then they warn that all your code will be rewritten in Rust anyway, so prepare for unemployment. Finally, the dream escalates to its horrifying conclusion: "QUIT HAVING FUN" – because how dare you enjoy your pointer arithmetic and manual memory management? It's the programming equivalent of vegans telling meat-eaters they'll die of heart disease while you're just trying to enjoy your steak. Meanwhile, the C++ dev lies awake, haunted by the thought that maybe – just maybe – they should learn Rust before their GitHub contributions become vintage artifacts in the Computer History Museum.

The forbidden romance of our time: a C++ programmer falling head over heels for Rust. After years of wrestling with memory leaks and segmentation faults, our C++ dev has found salvation in Rust's memory safety and modern features. It's like watching someone who's been in a toxic relationship for 20 years finally find someone who respects their boundaries. The compiler actually prevents them from making bad decisions instead of just shrugging and saying "whatever, it's your funeral" when they dereference a null pointer.