Taking "Talk To Natives" Too Literally

Content python Paradigm Object-oriented, imperative, functional, procedural, reflective Designed by Guido van Rossum Developer Python Software Foundation First appeared 1990; 28 years agol" python lifespan Q AIL About 453,000 results (0.51 seconds) Pythons Lifespan Shopping News More Seltings Ball python: 30 years

Content php sucks lol avascript is bad and bloated python isn't real programming being aware that every programming language has its niche due to historical and usability reasons and hating on them makes no sense man, fuck MATLAB ProdrammerHumor.io

Content No text found in image

Content Hmmm, I'd make a strong case that if you are an advanced user of Python you already inherently know the basics of C, at least to some extent. 2

The classic "I'll just roll my own" energy right here. Using random , time , or os modules for random number generation? That's for normies who understand entropy and cryptographic security. Real chads hardcode their RNG by... wait, what? Just picking a number and calling it random? The top panel shows the sensible approach—leveraging well-tested external modules that actually use system entropy, hardware noise, or timing jitter to generate proper random numbers. The bottom panel? That's the developer who thinks return 4; // chosen by fair dice roll. guaranteed to be random. is peak engineering. It's deterministic chaos masquerading as randomness, and honestly, it's the kind of confidence that breaks cryptographic systems and makes security researchers weep into their coffee. Pro tip: If your random number generator doesn't involve at least some external entropy source, you're basically just writing fan fiction about randomness.

The existential crisis of the this keyword across programming languages is pure comedy gold. In C++, it's a straightforward pointer to your class instance—neat and tidy. Java keeps it classy with a reference instead. Then Python swoops in with its explicit self parameter like "let's just call it what it is, folks!" But the real punchline? JavaScript, where this is whatever it feels like being that day—sometimes the window, sometimes an element, sometimes your function's parent... who knows! It's the programming equivalent of that friend who changes personality based on who they're hanging out with. No wonder C developers are looking at JS like they've witnessed a crime against computer science.