What Type Of Programmer Are You?

Content Just Fix The Warnings My IDE Me

Content DADDY, WHAT ARE CLOUDS MADE Of? 2 LINUX SERVERS, MO STLY

Content STOP DOING FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING LOOPS WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE GIVEN NAMES YEARS OF HOFs yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for going higher than CALLBACKS Wanted to go higher anyway for a laugh? We had a tool for that: It was called AbstractWidgetLocalizerManagerFactoryBe "Yes please FOLD over this collection . Please give me a CURRIED function" - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged Functional LOOK at what Programmers have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the boilerplate compilers we built for them Functional (These are REAL Functions, done by REAL Programmers ): set it Lens' 8 a - a - g -) set In v g runidentity (la (const (Identity v)) 8) Class Profunctor () :: Maybe a - (a - Maybe b) - Maybe b dinap a over :: Lens' s a - (a - a) - 8 - s over In g g runidentity (In (Identity viev :: Lens's a - g - a Inap f dinap f id 01530 10 () :: Maybe a - Maybe b - Maybe b return :: a - Maybe a viev Is v s getConst (la Const s) ????? ??????? ????????????????? "Hello I would like a Monad m please" They have played us for absolute fools

Content DEALERSHIP GOALS TRUCK SALES KOFoRd AUTOEXEC . BAT

The JavaScript ecosystem is basically Pennywise from IT luring developers into the sewer with promises of "new frameworks." And what do we do? We dive right in, head first, no questions asked. Next thing you know, you're neck-deep in npm dependencies wondering why you didn't just stick with jQuery. The framework churn is so real that by the time you master one, three more have popped up claiming to be "revolutionary." It's the developer equivalent of Stockholm syndrome – we keep going back for more punishment.

Content Me: mom can we have eXC? Mom: no, we have eXC at home eXC at home: