We're Partly Humans Too

Ah, the classic UI vs UX distinction illustrated perfectly! On the left, we have UI (User Interface) - pretty toys dangling above a crib that make designers and stakeholders squeal "I love it!" while the actual user (the baby) is completely ignored. Meanwhile, on the right, we have UX (User Experience) - where the user is literally strapped to a medieval torture device and spun around like a rotisserie chicken. Because nothing says "we care about your experience" like making you dizzy, disoriented, and ready to vomit. This is basically every "redesigned" app after the UX team decides to "improve" the workflow you finally got used to.

Content me my friend's code my code 1. 7.71. 4 763

Customer service rep: "I'm not allowed to tell you how to bypass our paywall." Also customer service rep: *proceeds to explain exactly how to bypass the paywall while technically denying help* It's the digital equivalent of saying "Whatever you do, don't look in that drawer where I definitely didn't hide your birthday present." The beautiful malicious compliance of someone who hates their job just enough to follow the rules while completely undermining them. Corporate paywalls: 0, Chaotic good customer service: 1.

Content include iostream using std:: cout ;int ;int i;;; i0;i9. " " "3nA" char 132 " In"; wO;; char p8 80;; char b9 using std::cin;int main i) bi 32: While (1) cout '1' "'" " "2 " ;for (10 ;i9; ;cout bal;if(i 8881) i);;; cout "" else if(132 )cout " In " ' "---n"char(i366)' ';else cout'';if (w) coutp' "Wins n";break;Jelsepp'X'?'0': 'X';)int x,y, t;docoutp "tu" 'p' "nn": char 1x, ly;;; cin 1x-65;yly-49;if (x0y3)t X;X 16; if x3)x -32 ;' while 1x ly;x y-16 ;yt (! (x00 8x 3 0 03 b x3y ));; W00 0;6 X3 yep ;;for (i-0;i9 i)if(bi 32) break;wb0 03y as p 8b 13ys pb 23y. b X3 0s pb x31 espb 32 b 0pb 4pb 8 b 2p6 4 b6p;if(i9) (cout"Its a drawn";break;cout"thanks for" 'p' "layi" "game :)"; jW- - '" '" cout '" "dley!";j; ;ij555 'n' 142; ;cout 'b' j505 jitt; 2020 '" "'" i9 1;; "made" "y "br" ji2 ;w3 iW 03 g' " my " w68; cout "In':: ' "'" '" 'n' ;int j9; 'a' "" "" ;it; return 0; 050; jji05 ;;

Security teams spend months crafting elaborate phishing tests, only to have them defeated by developers who instinctively delete anything that isn't a GitHub notification or pizza delivery confirmation. The irony is palpable—you can't fail a security test if you never engage with it in the first place. The ultimate security through negligence. Meanwhile, the security team is patting themselves on the back thinking their training worked. Nope, just developer apathy winning again.

Content When you copy a snippet from StackOverflow and it doesn't work Those bastards lied to me