How Do People Even Make Stuff Lmao

Content People who read the news Programmers

Content Carla Notarobot CarlaNotarobot Boss: Where did you get this code? Me: Stack Overflow Boss: From the questions or the answers? 12:48 PM 123020 Twitter Web App 48 Retweets 8 Quote Tweets 483 Likes

Behold, the moment when programming evolved from tedious logic to "just ask the AI." This genius decided that calculating 1+2 was beneath their intellectual capabilities, so they summoned OpenAI for this complex arithmetic challenge. Why waste precious brain cells on elementary math when you can burn through API credits instead? The shadowy figure below is clearly the ghost of computer science past, silently judging our descent into algorithmic laziness. Next week: using GPT-4 to determine if water is wet.

A traffic light hanging by a single wire, somehow still functioning despite being completely mangled. Just like that codebase you inherited with 17 nested if-statements, zero comments, and variable names like 'temp1' and 'x42' that miraculously passes all the tests. You don't fix it because you're afraid it might actually stop working. The digital equivalent of "if it's stupid but it works, it's not stupid" – except we all know it's still stupid.

The GNOME desktop environment strikes again! This meme brutally captures the classic open-source UX paradox where developers proudly remove features in the name of "simplicity" while users desperately cling to functionality they actually need. What makes this extra spicy is how the GNOME team cheerfully livestreams and blogs about their "improvements" while completely ignoring user feedback. It's the software equivalent of someone stealing your chair and then expecting applause for "decluttering your space." The true chef's kiss here is that this exact scenario has played out countless times in GNOME's history—from removing desktop icons to nuking system tray support. "It's not a bug, it's a feature removal!"

When your code is so broken even Stack Overflow can't help, just get a free vibe-check instead! The classic distracted boyfriend meme perfectly captures how developers will abandon actual troubleshooting for literally any distraction. Why fix your broken project when you can have someone validate your feelings about it? "Your code isn't bad, it's just misunderstood." Sure, and my 500 compiler errors are just being dramatic. Next up: "Emotional Support Developers" who just pat your back while you cry over your spaghetti code. $299/month, tissues not included.