Exit Employee Sends His Regards

Content Was any programmer ever beaten for bad code? I've personally witnessed this done. The offending engineer, who completly acknowledged he'd messed up and introduced code that broke an important build, was surrounded by the team and shot. With nerf guns. Everyone laughed, he rolled back his commit and everything proceeded just fine. 124.3K views View Upvoters . View Sharers 4 670 92 0 1 000

Content Molly Struve mollystruve More explicit the better code comments be like (Open box before eating pizza. ALT a pie

Content Question CSE 102 69. Write a programme to print the pattern. 1 4 6 9 11 13 17 19 21 23 My Answer winclude stdio.h int main() printf("1n"); printf ("4 6n"); printf("9 11 13n"); printf ("17 19 21 23n"); return o; WHY ARE YOU BODING ME? I'M RIGHT

The true family business - legacy COBOL code! Someone's friend just inherited a codebase last touched by mom in the 90s, while the reply cleverly points out this isn't the kind of inheritance pattern they teach in CS class. Nothing says job security like maintaining 30-year-old code written by your actual parent. The family that codes together, stays locked in maintenance hell together. If your resume says "COBOL" in 2023, banks are already throwing money at you while sobbing uncontrollably.

The code snippet shows a hilariously naive approach to database deduplication that would make any DBA have a heart attack. It's basically iterating through social security numbers in a government database and if there are duplicates, it just deletes ALL matches with that SSN! The comment even includes the infamous Unix rm -rf command, implying this is the digital equivalent of taking a flamethrower to your records. Instead of properly identifying which record is legitimate or merging data, this nuclear option would just obliterate everyone's records if there happened to be a duplicate SSN. Congratulations, you've fixed identity fraud by erasing everyone's identity! Task failed successfully!

When politics meets version control and developers collectively facepalm! The fake news headline about an executive order forcing Git to revert from 'main' back to 'master' branches is peak tech-politics satire. For context: many Git repositories changed default branch names from 'master' to 'main' around 2020 to use more inclusive terminology. The joke imagines a world where government mandates coding conventions—like forcing everyone to use tabs instead of spaces or declaring semicolons mandatory. Next up: executive order making all boolean variables named 'isTrump' default to TRUE.