Debugging goes brrr

Ah, the ultimate job security plan! Turns out the one person AI won't replace is the colleague who contributes absolutely nothing. That sweet spot where you're so useless that even automation can't justify the ROI of replacing you. It's like finding a bug so bizarre that QA just labels it as "expected behavior" and moves on. The perfect defense against technological unemployment isn't upskilling—it's strategic incompetence!

Content Me who spent an hour to answer a Stackoverflow question as detailed as possible The a-hole who commented "It worked, thanks" but didn't mark my answer as correct nor upvote the damn thing

Content is is he one of us

Ah, the classic developer workflow! Why spend 15 minutes reading documentation when you can spend 6 hours banging your head against the keyboard trying random solutions from Stack Overflow? The red puppet represents every developer I've ever code-reviewed for – staring at comprehensive docs one second, then immediately diving face-first into "fuck it, we ball" territory. This is why your production server is on fire right now. Your commit message might as well be "I have no idea what I'm doing but it works somehow."

Content java String str "hello"; str str.toUpperCase (); stdrstring str: "hello'; std. for each(ste begin(), str. end), l (chark c) c std: touper(c, std.:locale());

The universal debugging technique that shouldn't work but somehow does. When your code throws errors, make zero changes, hit run again, and suddenly it works flawlessly. The digital equivalent of blowing into a Nintendo cartridge. Computer science degrees cost $100k to teach you that sometimes the machine just needs a moment to think about what it did wrong.