Why Fork It When Nobody Fixes It

The bell curve of git commit sanity. On the left, the blissfully ignorant junior dev who squashes multiple feature changes into a single commit. On the right, the battle-hardened senior who does the same because life's too short. And in the middle? The poor mid-level developer meticulously separating each feature into its own commit, following best practices that nobody actually reads in the git log. The sweet irony of development—you either die a hero or live long enough to stop caring about commit granularity.

Ah yes, the sacred GitHub portfolio tour. "And here's my revolutionary weather app that checks if it's raining... and over here, my groundbreaking to-do list with exactly three commits." Nothing says "hire me" like 47 repositories of unfinished projects with names like "test123" and "new-framework-tutorial." The digital equivalent of showing off a hat collection, except the hats are all half-knitted and abandoned after watching the first 20 minutes of a YouTube tutorial.

The classic "chess match with the dog" scenario we've all faced. Some junior dev just hard-coded environment variables directly into the build pipeline instead of using config files, and now your changes mysteriously vanish in production while everything passes in staging. That innocent face says it all – they have no idea they've created a deployment hellscape that'll take you three days and seven coffees to untangle. Meanwhile, they're getting praised for "making things work" while you contemplate a career in sheep farming.

The GitHub contribution graph: where your self-worth as a developer gets reduced to little green squares. We've got "Just a Developer" with their random sprinkles of productivity, "The Weekender" who only codes when normal people are partying, and "The Unrealistic Expectations" who apparently never sleeps, eats, or touches grass. Don't forget "Getting Ready to Search for a New Job" with that sudden burst of activity right before updating the resume. The "GitHub Wizard" trying to look consistently productive, "The Mondrian" creating actual art with their commits, and "The Cupid Shuffle" forming little hearts because... why code efficiently when you can make your contribution graph look pretty? Remember kids, quantity of commits ≠ quality of code. But try telling that to recruiters who think your GitHub activity is a personality test.

That moment when your code reviewer keeps finding "just one more thing" to fix in your PR, and your will to live evaporates with each comment. The Scooby Doo reference is perfect because by the 13th round of changes, you're no longer a developer—you're just a ghost of your former self, haunting the GitHub repository and muttering "ruh-roh" every time you get a notification. The only mystery you're solving now is how many more formatting tweaks you can make before your soul leaves your body completely.

The 2:34 AM text message that ruins your sleep cycle faster than a memory leak. Nothing says "professional workplace" like getting blasted for missing a meeting you weren't even invited to, followed by a critique of your commit messages that could've waited until business hours. The cherry on top? That passive-aggressive "YOLO" sign-off. Because nothing screams "I'm a reasonable team lead" like sending career threats via text message in the middle of the night and ending with 2010's most overused acronym. This is why developers keep their phones on silent and their resumes updated.