Friday Reminder

The ultimate programmer pickup line that makes everyone else's flirting attempts look like deprecated code! This gem cleverly plays on Git terminology where "commit" means both pushing code changes to a repository AND making a relationship official. The double entendre is absolutely *chef's kiss* for devs who spend more time with repositories than with actual humans. Guaranteed to either land you a date or trigger a merge conflict with their personal boundaries.

The eternal dance of code reviews, beautifully captured in its natural habitat. Reviewer drops a last-minute bombshell requirement that wasn't in any spec. Developer responds with the most honest code documentation ever written—and somehow still gets those sweet, sweet approvals. The best part? It got merged anyway! Nothing says "professional software development" quite like telling your reviewer where to shove their Assembly support and then pushing to master anyway. The 8 likes are from other developers who've been there but never had the courage.

Code reviewers frantically protecting the codebase from "obvious bugs that will take down prod" while completely ignoring the harmless typo in a comment that someone pointed out. Priorities, right? The tiger (production-breaking bug) is literally stalking in the background while everyone's laser-focused on the innocent bunny (typo). Meanwhile, the actual critical issue is about to pounce and destroy everything. Classic engineering team dynamics where we'll spend 45 minutes debating variable naming conventions while the server is actively on fire.

That moment when you finally get promoted to senior developer with admin access, only to discover the horrifying spaghetti code your predecessors have been hiding in private repos. You're now responsible for maintaining code that looks like it was written by a caffeinated raccoon with a keyboard. Congratulations on your promotion—you're now legally obligated to pretend this monstrosity is maintainable during client meetings.

Oh the sweet innocent joy of thinking your code is ready for production! First panel: you're all confident, "This ticket is done, git push" - what could possibly go wrong? Second panel: QA has entered the chat and suddenly your masterpiece isn't looking so masterful. But the REAL horror story? That third panel when DevOps slides into your DMs like the final boss of a roguelike game you weren't prepared to play. The three stages of developer grief: confidence, concern, and existential dread. Ship it anyway!

The first comment: "When I do git blame, it's not about finding the person who did the mistake. I want to find out when the code was added, which task it was related to, and if I need more details, the person who wrote the code." The reply: "I use git blame just to make sure it wasn't me before I go on a tirade..." Ah yes, the two types of developers. The professional who uses tools for their intended purpose, and the rest of us who just want plausible deniability before ranting in Slack. Nothing quite like that moment of relief when you discover someone else wrote that abomination, followed by the crushing realization it was actually you from three years ago.