Commit Messages Are For Nerds

That feeling when your pull request finally gets approved after 47 code reviews, 18 requested changes, and 3 weeks of waiting... You're not just a developer anymore—you're royalty . Sitting on that throne of merged code, looking slightly uncomfortable because deep down you know your hastily added console.log() statements are still in there. The kingdom is yours until QA finds that edge case you totally forgot to test.

Ah yes, the most sophisticated version control system: hiding your .git folder inside the Windows directory. Because nothing says "I trust my code management skills" like burying your repository next to system files where no mortal dares to tread. Security through obscurity at its finest. The digital equivalent of hiding your house key under a rock that says "Not a key here."

The UNHOLY TRINITY of a developer's existence! GitHub looking all dark and mysterious like it's judging your commit messages. StackOverflow with that knowing smirk because it's seen your desperate 3AM questions. And then there's YOUR CODE - that absolute DEMON CHILD that started as a "quick fix" and evolved into an eldritch horror that would make Lovecraft weep! The tattoo is *chef's kiss* perfect because your code is LITERALLY permanently etched into your nightmares. It's the monster YOU created and now must live with FOREVER!

The brain's midnight existential crisis about Git terminology strikes again! That moment when your neurons refuse to shut down because they've discovered the ultimate version control paradox: you're requesting to pull code that you're actually trying to push . The terminology comes from the maintainer's perspective - they're "pulling" your changes into the main repo. But from your perspective, you're desperately trying to shove your 3AM code refactoring into the codebase before anyone notices those 47 TODOs you left behind.

Nothing strikes more fear into a developer's heart than asking for code review. The bear in the forest is just your senior dev who'd rather maul you than look at your 47 file changes with the comment "fixed stuff." The perfect survival strategy: create a PR so terrible that everyone suddenly develops selective blindness. Works on bears, tech leads, and that one architect who hasn't written actual code since Java 6.

Rewrote the entire codebase but called it "minor changes" in the commit message? Absolute chad move. Nothing says "I fear no code review" like casually pushing 4000 lines of changes directly to main with that description. The person who has to review this PR is probably contemplating a career change right now. It's the programming equivalent of renovating an entire house and telling your spouse you "just moved a few things around."