The Unbreakable Developer

Content TOP DEFINITION C f S A programming language for Real Men. Most languages try to provide a simplified way to solve specific problems well. C makes no such concession and tries to be mediocre at everything. It lets you program at a very high level, and a very low level in the same program. It lets you write procedural code, object oriented code, generic code and mix them all up. It makes you decide everything and provides no help if you get it wrong. It is by far the biggest, most complicated, ugly, down-right dangerous language you can use. But it does run fast. It takes at least twice as long to program in C as any other major language (except C). The men who program in C are Real Men. The women who program in C are Real Men too. You can spot a C programmer from their testosterone fueled swagger, and the unbelievable amount of contempt they inject into the phrase Java "programmer". They'll probably do the air quotes and all. Dev: 'Hey, Reg, you know C right? What does: "Isrc Cont. spp(52) : error C2679: binary '': no operator found which takes a right- hand operand of type 'int' (or there is no acceptable conversion) C: Program Files Microsoft Visual Studio 8VC include vector(392): could be 'std::VectoriteratorTy, Alloc std::VectoriteratorTy, Alloc::operator (const std::VectoriteratorTy, Alloc)' with TyMain::Cont, Allocstd::allocatorMain::Cont while trying to match the argument list "(std::VectoriteratorTy, Alloc, int)' with TyMain::Cont, Allocstd::allocatorMain::Cont " mean?' Reg: 'You missed a semicolon at the end of the line.'

Nothing says "I value our friendship" like asking for help with undocumented code featuring variables like x1 , temp , and doTheThing() . That slow Kermit retreat is the physical manifestation of my soul leaving my body when I realize I'm about to waste 3 hours of my life deciphering someone's digital hieroglyphics. Pro tip: if you want help debugging, maybe name your variables something other than "stuff" and "idk" first.

Ah, the ancient architectural marvel of "I'll fix it later" engineering! This stone bridge with its bizarre double-arch structure perfectly represents what happens when you push your janky code to production while whispering sweet nothings about "cleaning it up in the refactor." The bridge is somehow still standing despite looking like it was designed by three different engineers who never spoke to each other. Just like your codebase after six months of "temporary fixes" and "we'll document this later" commits. Spoiler alert: The refactor never comes. That bridge has probably been "temporary" since 1873, much like your workaround for that authentication bug from 2019.

Oh. My. GOD. The absolute RAGE that boils through my veins when someone calls their half-baked, no-documentation, "just-vibes" approach to programming "vibe coding." SWEETIE, your code isn't "intuitive" or "flowing with the universe" - it's a NIGHTMARE that the next developer will have to decipher like some ancient hieroglyphics! You didn't "feel your way" through that algorithm - you just didn't bother to learn proper practices and now we're all paying the price! Next person who says they're "vibe coding" is getting their keyboard privileges REVOKED. 💅

Content christina zhu cszhu if you're not happy single, you won't be happy in a relationship. true happiness comes from removing 100 Print Statements after solving an obscure programming bug, not from someone else 15:35 21 Feb. 20 Twitter Web App

Content You google a bug There is a StackOverflow post with vour exact bug The post is not from 5 years ago There is a solution with many upvotes Made using MenBoard to