The Tech Support Triangle Of Doom

The diagram shows two paths to the same destination: "bugs." One path is labeled "not testing your code" (the direct route), while the other is a longer path labeled "extensively testing your code" (the scenic route). Meanwhile, a cow just stands there wondering why humans make things so complicated. Let's be honest—we all know we should test, but when the deadline's tomorrow and the client's breathing down your neck, that shortcut starts looking mighty tempting. Both paths lead to bugs anyway, so why waste time pretending otherwise? The universe finds a way to break your code regardless of your test coverage.

When your weight variable hits zero and keeps decreasing, you don't disappear—you just wrap around to the maximum value! This is the programmer's version of weight loss where integer underflow turns you from a skinny stick figure into a buff dude instantly. No gym required, just exploit the data type limitations. It's basically the same hack that made Pac-Man playable after level 255. The thin person panicking about being "erased from existence" clearly never implemented proper boundary checks!

Content You're working on a legacy program, and bump into a problem You find the exact problem, and a working solution on Stack Overflow It's the solution YOU posted, last time you worked on this app; 4 years ago.

Content When there's a bug in production What do we want? Temp workarounds! How long will we use them? Indefinitely!

Content "UGH.I CAN'T GET ANY WORK DONE UNTIL FIX THIS BUG 5 MiNUTES SIR LATER AWE OGIKED THE BUG. LOOKS LIKE UM DONE COB THE DAY ProgrammerHumor.

Content Program not responding SLICK CLICK CLICK ICK CLICK CIT K CLICK ICK CLI CK "LIO CLICKLUR CK ( Ox Issue Resolved 317 clicks has corrected the error www.mrlovenstein.com