The Malicious Compliance Of Code

The classic API response contradiction that haunts my nightmares. Server returns HTTP 200 OK (everything's fine!) but then smugly delivers {"error": true} in the response body. It's like a waiter saying "Your meal is ready!" while handing you an empty plate with a note that says "actually we're out of food." Seven years of backend development and I'm still finding APIs that pull this nonsense. The worst part? Some senior dev is defending this somewhere right now as "technically correct."

Content Caitlin caithuls RELATIVE: You know about computers, right? ME (has a degree in computer science): No

Content name my band jpg (170 KB, 9191200) google yandex iqdb wait Anonymous 042424(Wed)14:53:04 No. 100165474 v ITT you are the CEO of StackOverflow, how do you make more money now that LLMs are cutting into your profits? I say we gamify the website. add a virtual currency, loot boxes gacha mechanics, and a f2p live service model add paid cosmetics which you can add to your profile each season we will have a battle pass add several premium subscription tiers do collabs with famous IPs, like John Wick, Family Guy, Dragonball, Jujutsu Kaisen, and Naruto market heavily to children so that we have lifelong users pay influencersstreamers to stream our website and praise all the new game mechanics. People like Qc. He doesn't have any background in programmingCS? Who cares, just pay him to stream our website. It's just that simple. ProarammerHumor.io

Five years of professional coding experience and still googling how to center a div? Completely normal. The eternal impostor syndrome hits different in tech—where yesterday's expert is today's confused newbie thanks to some random framework update. You could be architecting complex systems by day and questioning if you even belong in the industry by night. The cognitive dissonance is just part of the job description they conveniently left out of the offer letter.

Oh. My. GOD. The eternal software development NIGHTMARE in one perfect image! 😭 On the left: you're drowning in a tangled mess of spaghetti code where changing a PROFILE IMAGE SIZE somehow breaks the entire system. Like, excuse me?! I just wanted to make an avatar 2 pixels larger and now the whole application is having an existential crisis! On the right: you've got this pristine architectural masterpiece with all the fancy buzzwords - but SURPRISE! - adding one tiny feature means touching 10 different services and dependencies, which means you're basically rewriting the entire codebase anyway. The grass is NEVER greener in software development. You're either battling a monster you didn't create or a monster you meticulously designed yourself. There's just no winning! 💀

Content Cycles in family tree software Asked 8 years, 10 months ago Active 4 years, 8 months ago Viewed 231k times 1594 votes Locked. This question and its answers are locked because the question is off-topic but has historical significance. It is not currently accepting new answers or interactions. 560 I am the developer of some family tree software (written in C and Qt). I had no problems until one of my customers mailed me a bug report. The problem is that the customer has two children with their own daughter, and, as a result, he can't use my software because of errors