The Dev Breaketh And The Dev Fixeth

Content rAskReddit uglitteredalien 6h NSFW What's your 'better than sex'? Advice 4 52 183 Share SINGLE COMMENT THREAD VIEW ALL Boomshicleafaunda 5h Write code that complies without errors and runs without bugs on my first try. Reply 4 81 J talentlessbluepanda 4h I had an orgasm just reading that. Reply 4 23 J ProdrammerHumor.io

Ah, the inevitable collision of aesthetic and reality. "Vibe coding" is basically writing code while listening to lo-fi beats and pretending you're in a movie montage. Feels great until you hit that first syntax error and realize your aesthetic doesn't fix broken loops. The harsh truth is that typing code with RGB keyboards in a dimly lit room doesn't magically grant debugging superpowers. When everything crashes, you're still frantically Googling Stack Overflow like the rest of us mortals. It's like buying a chef's knife and wondering why you can't cook like Gordon Ramsay. The vibes don't ship the product—competence does.

That thousand-yard stare when your brain decides to solve your recursive function issue during a social event. Your body might be discussing weekend plans, but your mind just figured out it was a missing semicolon all along. The real party is happening in your prefrontal cortex where that elusive edge case just got handled. Meanwhile everyone else is wondering why you're nodding at nothing and mumbling "of course, the buffer overflow."

OH. MY. GOD. The EMOTIONAL DAMAGE of C++ development laid bare! 💅 On Linux? It's all sunshine, rainbows, and "teehee, I compiled successfully on the first try!" Pure unbridled JOY. The compiler practically THROWS CONFETTI when your code works! Meanwhile, Windows C++ developers are basically living in a film noir NIGHTMARE. They've seen things. TERRIBLE things. Like 500 linker errors before breakfast. Their souls have been crushed by Visual Studio's cryptic error messages that might as well be written in ancient Sumerian. The contrast is so DRAMATIC I'm getting heart palpitations! The duality of developer existence has never been so savagely portrayed!

Content It's a time zone change on December 31st in shanghal. See this pace for details of 1927 11860 in Shanghai. Basically at midnight at the end of 1927, the clocks went back 5 minutes and 52 seconds. So "1927-12-31 23:54:08" actually happened twice, and it looks like Java is parsing it as the later possible instant for that local datetime - hence the Just another episode in the often weird and wonderful world of time zones. rebuilt with version 20132 01 1.98. The original question would no ionger demonstrate quite the same behaviour. In 2013a, the result would be 358 seconds, with a transition time of 23-54-03 instead of 23:54:08 I only noticed this because I'm collecting questions like this in Noda Time, in the form of unit tests... The test has now been changed, but it just goes to show - not even historical data is safe In TZDB 2014f, the time of the change has moved to 1900-12-31, and it's now a mere 343 second change (so the time between t and t1 IS 344 seconds, it vou see what I mean). To answer a question around a transition at 1900... it looks like the Java time zone implementation treats all time zones as simply being in their standard time for any instant before the start of 1900 UTC: public class Test public static void main(String args) throws Exception Long for (String id : TimeZone getAvailableIDs) Time?one Zone TimeZone.getTimeZone (id); zone. getraworset zone.gecurtsetstart Sustem.out.println(id); The code above produces no output on my Windows machine. So any time zone which has any offset other than its standard one at the start of 1900 will count that as a transition. 1ZDB itself has some data going back earlier than that, and doesn't rely on any idea of a "fixed standard time (which is what getawOffset assumes to be a valid concept) so other libraries need t introduce this artiticial transition edited Mar 27. 2023 at 19:45 9 54 72 newered lul 27. 2011 at 8:31 Jon Skeet 1.4m 873 49186 4 Our is it still accurate? Son Sees

The soul-crushing TRAUMA of completing all your pull request tasks only to be AMBUSHED by SonarQube's code quality checks! 😱 There you are, thinking you're DONE, ready to push that glorious code... and BOOM! SonarQube shows up like an uninvited party guest screaming about your 47 code smells, 12 vulnerabilities, and that ONE line where you dared to use a deprecated method. The audacity! Your perfectly functional code is now apparently a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY because you didn't follow some arbitrary coding standard that nobody mentioned until NOW. And fixing these issues? Just kiss your weekend goodbye, honey! 💅