The Cosmic Mystery Of Programming

Content Penguins do not fly, they swim (Learn CSS Transforms by Building a Penguin - Step 86) 53288 O Closed wblondel opened this issue on Jan 20 2 comments wblondel commented on Jan 20 edited Contributor Describe the Issue On the 86th step of the "Learn CSS Transforms by Building a Penguin" course in the "Responsive Web Design" certification, this fun fact is shown Fun fact: Penguins cannot fly without wings. 1 believe this is a mistake, because even with wings, penguins cannot fly. However, they need them to swim. Affected Page https:www.freecodecamp.orglearn2022responsive-web-designlearn-css-transforms-by-building-a-penguinstep-86 Your code NA Expected behavior In my opinion, the fun fact should be replaced with: Fun fact: Penguins cannot swim without wings. Assignees ShaunSHamilton Labels (scope: curriculum (type: bug Projects None yet Milestone No milestone Development No branches or pull requests Notifications Customize A Subscribe You're not receiving notifications from this thread.

The kid's "brute-force attack protection" is pure evil genius. While everyone's freaking out over his code, he's just sitting there with that smug little grin. His masterpiece? A login system that shows "Wrong login or password" even when the password is correct—but ONLY on the first attempt. It's basically digital psychological warfare. Every developer in that room just died inside imagining the hours of debugging hell this would cause. The coffee guy spitting out his drink is all of us realizing we'd probably format our entire machine before finding this little gem.

The pinnacle of debugging assistance right here! Some poor dev is trying to fix a critical issue with... *checks notes*... a toolbox inside another toolbox in what's clearly a game. No logs, no details, just existential despair and a vague description that reads like it was written during a sugar crash. The real bug is this bug report. It's the equivalent of telling your doctor "something hurts somewhere sometimes" and expecting a precise diagnosis. Even better is the "Debug Information" section that's as empty as my will to live after reading this. Next time you think your documentation is insufficient, remember this masterpiece that managed to combine the eloquence of a toddler with the technical precision of a drunk fortune teller.

Content TOP DEFINITION C y f 3 A programming language for Real Men. Most languages try to provide a simplified way to solve specific problems well. C makes no such concession and tries to be mediocre at everything. It lets you program at a very high level, and a very low level in the same program. It lets you write procedural code, object oriented code, generic code and mix them all up. It makes you decide everything and provides no help if you get it wrong. It is by far the biggest, most complicated, ugly, down-right dangerous language you can use. But it does run fast. It takes at least twice as long to program in C as any other major language (except C). The men who program in C are Real Men. The women who program in C are Real Men too. You can spot a C programmer from their testosterone fueled swagger, and the unbelievable amount of contempt they inject into the phrase Java "programmer". They'll probably do the air quotes and all. Dev: 'Hey, Reg, you know C right? What does: "Isrc Cont.spp(52) : error C2679: binary '': no operator found which takes a right- hand operand of type 'int' (or there is no acceptable conversion) C: Program Files Microsoft Visual Studio 8VC include vector (392): could be 'std: VectoriteratorTy, Alloc std:VectoriteratorTy, Alloc:operator (const std:VectoriteratorTy, Alloc' with TyMain::Cont, Allocstd allocatorMain::Cont while trying to match the argument list '(std::VectoriteratorTy, Alloc, int)' with TyMain::Cont, Allocstd :allocatorMain::Cont " mean?' Reg: 'You missed a semicolon at the end of the line'

Content FOODEC I think they meant REBBI 03 088080 00000 Someone just got assigned a heart as their meal

The beautiful irony of throwing an AssertionError with the message "Unreachable code reached" is just *chef's kiss*. It's the programming equivalent of installing a security camera inside a black hole. You're basically telling the compiler "this code will never execute" and then writing an error message for when it does execute. The cosmic paradox of defensive programming at its finest! This is the senior developer's version of "trust no one, not even yourself." They've been burned too many times by "impossible" edge cases showing up in production at 3 AM.