Take It From A Big Problem To Not My Problem

The eternal gambler's fallacy of AI development! Just like poker addicts who swear they'll quit right before hitting the jackpot, developers keep throwing prompt after prompt at LLMs, convinced the next one will magically produce perfect code. "Just one more prompt and this system will work flawlessly!" Meanwhile, the technical debt chips keep stacking up, and the house (reality) always wins. The true irony? We're all sitting at this table pretending "vibe coding" with AI is somehow more sophisticated than randomly drawing cards from a deck.

That moment when your client emails a biblical scroll of "bugs" they found while using Internet Explorer 6 on their Windows XP fossil. Like Napoleon here, you're just staring into the abyss contemplating your life choices. What am I supposed to do? Build a time machine? The browser was discontinued in 2022 for a reason. No amount of CSS hacks or polyfills will save that trainwreck. But you'll still spend three days trying to fix it because the client pays your bills. Meanwhile, Chrome and Firefox users are having zero issues with your perfectly standards-compliant code.

The eternal battle: AI vs. Human programmers. While ChatGPT churns out clean, efficient code in seconds without any... physical distractions, human developers are proudly declaring victory in the most bizarre competition ever—the ability to scratch themselves while coding. Congratulations humans, you've found the one area where biological bodies still have the edge. Your uncomfortable physical form is your superpower. Silicon can't itch, but it also can't experience the satisfaction of a good scratch during a 3-hour debugging session.

Content Client in meeting: Wow it seems your team fixed all bugs!! Manager: Yes Developer: But I wanna.. Manager: uva. krishna.meme

When a senior dev tells you to "just read the documentation," what they really mean is "figure out how to connect these two completely unrelated pieces with zero context and make it work somehow." The documentation is always like those LEGO instructions that skip 17 critical steps and suddenly expect you to have built a quantum computer. And yet they'll look at you like you're the problem when you can't magically deduce what goes in between.

Alternate Jurassic Park ending: Dennis Nedry realizes he's the only IT guy maintaining a critical system with actual dinosaurs and demands fair compensation. Hammond reluctantly agrees instead of lowballing him. Movie ends peacefully, no one gets eaten, and the park probably has working door locks. The real horror was the salary negotiation all along.