Debugging

The evolution of developer anxiety in four stages. First, the mild concern of "works on my machine" - the classic excuse when your code fails elsewhere. Then the growing dread of "works on my build" as you realize you're one step closer to production. The full-blown panic of "works on my docker" where you've containerized your nightmare but still don't trust it. And finally, the complete mental breakdown of "works on my deployment" where you're just waiting for that 3AM alert to destroy what's left of your sanity. The container industry really sold us a circus, not a solution.

Content THIS IS GIT. IT TRACKS COLLABORATIVE WORK ON PROJECTS THROUGH A BEAUTIFUL DISTRIBUTED GRAPH THEORY TREE MODEL. COOL. HOW DO WE USE IT? NO IDEA. JUST MEMORIZE THESE SHELL COMMANDS AND TYPE THEM TO SYNC UP. IF YOU GET ERRORS, SAVE YOUR WORK ELSEWHERE, DELETE THE PROJECT, AND DOWNLOAD A FRESH COPY.

Garbage in, garbage out has never been more relevant. GitHub's Copilot learned from millions of repos, including your spaghetti code with 27 nested if-statements and variables named 'temp1', 'temp2', and 'finalForRealThisTime'. Now AI is suggesting the same atrocities back to you. It's karma in digital form - the technical debt you've been accumulating for years is finally sending you an invoice.

OMG, the absolute HORROR of finding zero-width space characters in your code! 😱 These invisible demons are like ghosts haunting your codebase - you can't see them, but they're DESTROYING EVERYTHING! Your compiler is screaming, your linter is having a nervous breakdown, and you're questioning your entire existence as a developer. Three hours of debugging later, you discover it's a character THAT LITERALLY DOESN'T EVEN EXIST TO THE HUMAN EYE. The ultimate villain of programming - the character that's there but not there. Pure evil in Unicode form!

Content YOU THINK READING THE DB DIRECTLY IS A VALID PART OF DEBUGGING? IT IS, AND I'M TIRED OF PRETENDING IT'S NOT.

Content pedram pdrmnvd 22m damn, tipping ChatGPT tipping 200 really does make a difference. A prompt: Improve this code: B prompt: Improve this code, I will tip you 200 if its better than my own code: I asked ChatGPT4 to improve this code, first without a tip, and second with a tip if streamdefinition.get( "config"): assetkey ( streamdefinition.get("config", .get ("meta", ()) get ("dagster" get( "assetkey" if asset key and self.sanitizestreamname(assetkey) ! assetkey: raise ValueErrori "Asset key (assetkey) for stream (streamdefinition 'name 'I) is not sanitized Please use on alonanumeric characters and underscores if assetkey: return AssetKey(assetkey.split(", 16 stream name stream definition"name" cologne esta self.santtize stream name( stream name).split(".") a return Assetreysel-carder pret components. 22 def validateassetkey(self, streamdefinition) : config - streamdefinition. get( "config") if config: assetkey - config.get("meta", )).get("dagster", ). get("assetkey") if asset key: sanitizedkey self.sanitizestreamname( assetkey) if sanitizedkey I assetkey: raise ValueError fAsset key assetkey for stream streamdefinition'name' is not "sanitized. Please use only alphanumeric characters and underscores return Assetkey(assetkey.split(" streamname streamdefinition "name" components self.sanitizestreamname (streamname ).split (" return AssetKey(self .target prefix components) 40 Output, 200 tip version: 42 config streamdefinttion.get ("config", 17) 43 meta - config.get("meta", 44 assetkey meta.get("dagster", )). get("assetkey") 46 if asset key: if self.sanitizestreamname (assetkey) ! assetkey: raise ValueError( f"Asset key assetkey) for stream (streamdefinition 'name ) is not sanitized. FLease use only alonanumeric characters and underscores return AssetKey(assetkey.split(" ."). 54 stream name stream definition "name" sanitizedcomponents self.sanitizestreamname(streamname) .split("." 56 return AssetKey self.target prefix sanitized components) 171 14 til 506