Call me masterchef because I make the best spaghetti around here.

The evolution of developer excuses is truly magnificent. We went from "it works on my machine" (the universal get-out-of-jail-free card) to "it works on my container!" - which is basically the same excuse wearing a fancy DevOps hat. Notice how the developer on the right is smiling while delivering the exact same non-solution. That's the true innovation of DevOps - not solving problems, just feeling better about them while using trendier terminology. Congratulations, we've containerized our excuses. Ship it!

Content PROJECT DEVELOPERS DESIGNERS MANAGERS QA SYSADMINS SEEN BY DEVELOPERS SEEN BY DESIGNERS SEEN BY PROJECT MANAGERS SEEN BY QA SEEN BY SYSADMINS ProgrammerHumor.i

Evolution of excuses. Left panel: Developer proudly proclaims "It works on my machine!" while the ops guy silently contemplates career choices. Right panel: Same developer, now with DevOps skills and a suspicious sunburn, declares "It works on my container!" The ops guy's expression remains unchanged – he knows containerized garbage is still garbage, just more portable. We've successfully moved the problem from one isolated environment to another, slightly fancier isolated environment. Progress!

The cloud bill from hell has arrived! Someone's serverless function just went nuclear at 24166% of the monthly limit, casually adding $96,280 to the bill. That innocent little function you deployed Friday evening before heading to the bar? It's been partying harder than you did. Vercel just sent the kind of notification that makes DevOps engineers update their resumes at 3 AM. The best part? That cheerful reminder you'll continue being charged $40 per 100 GB hours, as if saying "Hope you enjoyed your accidental Ferrari purchase, would you like fries with that?" This is why we can't have nice things in the cloud. Free tier giveth, infinite scaling taketh away.

Content C PROGRAMMERS FINDING OUT THAT BOTH LLVM AND GCC ARE WRITTEN IN C Confused screaming imaflip.com

Content 3 Building the image using docker run build . --networkhost fixed the issue for me. The error I was getting was caused by Docker not being able to access the Internet, so spoonfeeding it "hey, just use host" seems to have fixed the problem. Share Follow answered Jan 27 at 18:35 walnut salami 2,790 0 1 11 33 3 It's ... kind of surreal googling an error, opening a stackoverflow answer and finding out that both the question and the answer are mine but several months later - walnutsalami May 24 at 9:24