University Lied: It Was Space Complexity All Along

OH. MY. GOD. The "super intelligent" AI can't even grasp the most BASIC rule of chess?! 🙄 White moves first, sweetie! The fact that ChatGPT confidently makes the first move while playing black and then has the AUDACITY to suggest the same move to the human player is just... *chef's kiss* peak AI incompetence. This is why we're still light-years away from true AGI, people! Can't even handle a simple board game without a total meltdown of logic. And yet the tech bros keep screaming "THE SINGULARITY IS COMING!!!" Sure, Jan. Maybe teach your precious AI to play chess first? 💅

The meme is playing with two impossible computing feats. Finding an SHA-512 collision (where two different inputs produce the same hash) is practically impossible due to the algorithm's design - it would take more computing power than exists in the universe. Meanwhile, generating the same UUID repeatedly is statistically absurd since UUIDs are designed to be unique across space and time. It's like saying "I won the lottery five times in a row... by accident." The joke subverts the classic Chuck Norris format by showing Bad Luck Brian instead - implying even his terrible luck somehow breaks fundamental cryptographic principles.

The ultimate dual-purpose code! When room temperature drops below 23.5°C, start mining Bitcoin to generate heat from your overworked CPU/GPU. Otherwise, just chill for 10 seconds before checking again. Genius solution for winter utility bills - your computer either warms your room or conserves energy while waiting for the next temperature drop. Modern problems require modern solutions that make your electricity bill skyrocket in completely different ways!

The perfect illustration of developer priorities. Spend hours optimizing a binary search tree? Mild interest . Configure a complex database schema? Barely awake . But show us a joke about semicolons or tabs vs. spaces? INSTANT DOPAMINE HIT. We're simple creatures who'd rather scroll through memes than fix that memory leak we've been ignoring for weeks. Self-awareness level: embarrassingly high.

Nothing says "I panicked during a coding interview" quite like writing FizzBuzz with three separate if statements and continue in each one. The interviewer's face progression from neutral to facepalm to disbelief is the universal reaction to code that technically works but makes seasoned developers want to throw their mechanical keyboards out the window. Pro tip: If your solution has more continue statements than actual logic, your future teammates are already updating their resumes.

Ah yes, the anti-programming manifesto from someone who clearly had their code compile on the first try and couldn't handle the success. The author seems to believe computers should just magically do math without being told how. Next they'll expect their car to drive without a steering wheel because "wheels are circles, not driving devices." My favorite part is complaining about recursive methods with threads while typing this rant on a device powered by... wait for it... programming. That's like yelling at clouds for raining while standing under an umbrella. And that final while(true){ print(money); } snippet? If only it were that easy. I've been running that code for years and my bank account remains stubbornly unimpressed.