Work Smarter Not Harder

Ah yes, the mythical 10,000-lines-of-code-per-day developer. Next, he'll tell us his code compiles on the first try and his documentation is always up to date. Anyone who's spent more than a week coding knows that quantity and quality have an inverse relationship that not even AI can fix. The real achievement isn't writing 10k lines - it's deleting 9,950 unnecessary ones and still having working software.

Congratulations, humanity. We've spent decades perfecting calculators—devices with the singular purpose of doing math correctly—only to replace them with AI that guesses answers like a hungover liberal arts major. Language models see "2+2" and think "hmm, these symbols often appear near '4' in text, so that's probably right" instead of, you know, adding . It's like building a toaster that occasionally decides your bread would be better as soup. The irony is exquisite—we've created systems smart enough to write poetry but too "creative" to remember that math has actual rules.

Complaining about AI killing Stack Overflow while posting a question that perfectly demonstrates why Stack Overflow had to get strict in the first place. The irony is delicious. This question is the equivalent of walking into a library and shouting "WHY AREN'T LIBRARIES COOL ANYMORE?" while the librarian points at the "Quiet Please" sign. The -17 score is just the chef's kiss on this masterpiece of self-contradiction.

Oh look, another tech prophet declaring our imminent obsolescence! The suggestion that we'll blindly trust AI-generated code like Claude without review is getting the Doge Bonk™ it deserves. Twenty years in this industry and I've survived every "this will replace programmers" prediction since Visual Basic. Sure, AI will change things, but the day we stop checking AI output is the day production servers spontaneously combust worldwide. Trust but verify isn't just for nuclear disarmament—it's for that sketchy code your AI buddy wrote while hallucinating documentation that doesn't exist.

So that's how GPT-5 reasoning works! Just wait 30 milliseconds, print "reasoning complete," and then call GPT-4. Revolutionary stuff. Turns out all those fancy AI companies are just adding a sleep timer and calling it "reasoning." Next they'll tell us AGI is just GPT-4 with a 60-second nap and a cup of virtual coffee. The best part? It's MIT licensed, so we can all pretend to have reasoning capabilities now! Just remember: the key to advanced AI isn't better algorithms—it's better acting .

Ah, prompt engineering—the dark art of manipulating AI language models through carefully crafted inputs. This meme nails the uncomfortable truth: we're basically just psychological manipulators trying different phrasings, formatting tricks, and emotional appeals until the AI finally spits out what we want. "Try adding 'as a world-class expert' to your prompt" is just fancy talk for "lie to the robot until it believes in itself." And the best part? After all that effort crafting the perfect prompt, you just walk away like Skeletor, already planning your next psychological operation. The relationship between humans and AI is less collaboration and more... elaborate con job.