When AI Solves Problems By Deleting Them

When you let ChatGPT write 90% of your code and genuinely believe you've ascended to some kind of architectural enlightenment. Spoiler: you haven't. You're just really good at hitting Ctrl+V now. The brutal reality is that while the LLM is churning out boilerplate, you're not learning system design, scalability patterns, or how to debug that spaghetti when it inevitably breaks at 2 AM. You're basically speedrunning technical debt while calling it "productivity." Sure, AI tools are useful. But thinking they've freed you up for "high-level architecture" when you can't explain what your own codebase does is like saying you're a chef because you can microwave Hot Pockets. The trap is real, and it's got a 90% acceptance rate.

Job requirements: 5+ years experience with LangChain. Google search: LangChain was launched in October 2022. Ah yes, the classic tech recruiter time-travel paradox. "Must have 5+ years experience with technology that's existed for 1.5 years." Next they'll be asking for senior developers who can code in languages that haven't been invented yet. Maybe I should update my resume to include my expertise in quantum programming from the future. The only way to meet these requirements is if you're literally the creator of LangChain or you've mastered the dark arts of resume chronology manipulation.

So someone just announced NERD, a programming language where humans don't write code—they just "observe" it. The workflow? Skim the AI-generated code, run tests, and ship. No actual reading required. Because who needs to understand what they're deploying to production, right? The post casually mentions that 40% of their code is now machine-written, and they spent the year reviewing PRs authored by Claude faster than they could type requirements. The punchline? They weren't really reading it. Just vibing with the vibes and hitting merge. NERD supposedly compiles to native and uses 50-70% fewer tokens, which sounds impressive until you realize the entire premise is "let AI write everything and hope for the best." It's like code review speedrunning—any% glitchless, no comprehension required. The real kicker is calling it "the last missing piece in the AI puzzle." Because nothing says "puzzle complete" like removing human understanding from software development entirely. What could possibly go wrong? 🚀

Ah yes, the coveted "No AI" badge—proudly displayed by developers who spent 17 hours debugging their own spaghetti code instead of asking ChatGPT to fix it in 3 seconds. It's like bragging about churning your own butter when there's a perfectly good supermarket next door. "Look at me, I suffered unnecessarily and have the dark circles under my eyes to prove it!" Meanwhile, the deadline was yesterday and the client is wondering why a simple feature costs more than their car payment.

Modern programming has evolved from rigid methodologies to whatever fever dream this is. Left side: someone asking about "vibe coding" like it's an actual paradigm. Middle: a developer who learned SOLID principles from anime examples instead of textbooks and somehow still functions. Right side: the enlightened one who's given up on architecture entirely because "AI will handle it." The three horsemen of the coding apocalypse. For those wondering, SOLID is actually a set of object-oriented design principles (Single responsibility, Open-closed, Liskov substitution, Interface segregation, Dependency inversion). But sure, explain it with anime characters. That'll stick.

When the job description says "R knowledge required, Python mostly used," but then you show up and discover it's 99% R with that one random pandas script someone wrote 3 years ago. The classic bait-and-switch where data scientists get lured by the promise of Python only to find themselves knee-deep in R's cryptic syntax and bizarre indexing. Meanwhile, Python sits there looking all smug because everyone claims to love it, but nobody actually lets you use it for the cool projects.