There Will Be Signs

Ah, the eternal dev dream: "Can AI just handle all this data conversion crap so I don't have to?" Meanwhile, every developer who's spent weeks building custom parsers for legacy government PDFs is quietly sobbing in the corner. The real treasury isn't money—it's the sanity we lost converting Excel to JSON. Pro tip: if you want to feel true pain, try parsing a PDF that was originally a scanned document from 1997 that someone converted to Word and then back to PDF again.

The perfect karma loop: we write garbage code, feed it to AI, then act shocked when AI spits garbage back at us. It's like teaching a parrot all your worst swear words and then being offended when it curses at your in-laws. The AI didn't invent bad code—it just holds up a mirror to our collective coding sins. Next time you're cursing at GitHub Copilot's suggestions, remember: that monstrosity is built on the foundation of your stackoverflow copy-paste crimes.

Just build your own trillion-parameter AI model with a small indie team of 3 developers over the weekend! It's basically like making a to-do app but with more math. The creator's "What do you mean" response is the digital equivalent of watching someone suggest building a rocket to Mars using duct tape and a leaf blower. Turns out, recreating cutting-edge AI systems requires slightly more than Stack Overflow and energy drinks.

ChatGPT can't count words properly, and we're worried about AI taking our jobs? Please. The robot uprising will be delayed by basic arithmetic errors. It's like watching a calculator struggle with 2+2 while claiming it's ready to design nuclear reactors. The irony of an AI failing at following simple instructions about word count is just *chef's kiss* perfect job security.

Left guy's in denial about AI coding tools while right guy's already seen the git blame logs from the future. The eternal cycle continues: new tech emerges, developers panic, then end up maintaining the mess it creates. The only constant in programming is cleaning up after the latest "revolutionary" tool. Just wait until we're all writing prompts to fix the prompts that fixed the code that broke the system.

Ah, the classic "AI trying to be human" failure. The dataset shows numbers with their written forms, but then completely breaks when faced with 1111. While humans scream "Eleven Hundred Eleven" with the conviction of someone who's found a bug in production, the AI sits there smugly offering "Oneteen Onety One" like it just invented mathematics. The best part? The AI doesn't even realize it's wrong - just sitting there with that smug cat face, confident in its linguistic abomination. This is why we still have jobs, folks.