The Itchy Victory: Humans 1, AI 0

The AI hype squad thinks neural networks are magical black boxes of wonder until someone reveals the truth: it's just linear algebra with spicy matrix multiplication. That complex neural network diagram? Throw it away! All you need is Y=MX+P, the linear regression formula that's been around since the 1800s. Turns out the "future" is just statistics wearing a fancy turtleneck and calling itself AI.

Content Designer notices the button has 1 pixel too much padding § BLACKLYTe Developer

A Venn diagram that hits way too close to home. Engineers are never available, have infinite ego, and will loudly proclaim your project will take 2 weeks (spoiler: it won't). Meanwhile, AI is always there, responds instantly, and lies about taking just 1 minute instead. The overlap is the best part though - both are wildly overconfident about untested code and need extremely specific instructions that they'll promptly ignore anyway. It's basically choosing between a ghost that silently crashes your system or a human who'll blame you for not understanding their "vision." Welcome to the future, where your options are invisible tech debt or premature optimization. Pick your poison.

The duality of AI code reviews. Non-technical folks see a magical solution that writes perfect code while senior devs spot the nested callbacks, security vulnerabilities, and performance nightmares lurking beneath the surface. It's like watching someone admire a beautifully painted house without noticing it's built on quicksand. The hallucinated documentation is just the cherry on top of this algorithmic disaster cake.

Look, I've been around long enough to know that AI replacing programmers is the tech equivalent of "flying cars by 2020." But Stack Overflow? Yeah, that's actually happening. Why spend 20 minutes waiting for some moderator to mark your question as duplicate when ChatGPT will just... answer it? Wrong sometimes, sure, but at least it won't roast you for not including your environment details. Stack Overflow traffic has genuinely tanked since LLMs became mainstream. Turns out people prefer a hallucinating AI that's nice to them over a correct human who makes them feel like an idiot. Can't say I blame them.

Ah, the ancient scrolls of IBM wisdom. Back when computers were the size of rooms and management actually understood their limitations. Fast forward to 2023: "Let's have the AI make all our business decisions!" Meanwhile, when something breaks, it's still the human's fault. Funny how we've gone from "computers shouldn't make decisions" to "the algorithm said we should fire 30% of staff, so..." I'm sure this sign is framed right next to the "THINK" posters in IBM's museum of ignored advice.