The AI Ethics Circular Firing Squad

The ultimate LinkedIn tech bro wisdom has arrived! Nothing says "I'm disrupting the industry" like telling seasoned developers their decade of debugging nightmares is now obsolete because some AI can spit out half-baked code after being fed StackOverflow answers. The Kübler-Ross grief model for programmers is spot on though—we've moved from "AI will never replace us" to "WHY IS THIS CHATBOT WRITING BETTER REGEX THAN ME?!" in record time. My favorite part is the condescending "adapt or die" mentality from someone who probably thinks "fighting PHP demons" means they once had to center a div. Meanwhile, actual developers know AI is just another tool that generates bugs with unprecedented efficiency.

Ah yes, the sacred ritual of choosing your RGB gaming PC based on magical programming buffs instead of specs. Personally, I'd grab that Pink one faster than a senior dev leaves the office before a production deployment. 50% less burnout? Sign me up! The Red one is just a glorified compiler that doubles as a space heater. Meanwhile, the Green PC's electricity bill is so low it makes solar panels look like a scam. And Dark Blue? Basically paying for Stack Overflow Premium and ChatGPT rolled into hardware. The real trap is the Yellow one. Reducing procrastination by 50%? That just means 50% less time watching YouTube tutorials that you'll never implement.

THE ABSOLUTE AUDACITY of comparing AI prompt engineering to gambling is SENDING ME! 💀 Both involve throwing money at a system you barely understand, desperately hoping for that magical outcome while the house (or cursor) laughs all the way to the bank. You're either wasting time tweaking slot strategies or perfecting prompts for a function that could've been written in 20 minutes. And that last row? DEVASTATING TRUTH. Nothing says "professional developer" like spending 4 hours crafting the perfect prompt only to realize you've just been playing the world's nerdiest slot machine. The difference? At least gamblers KNOW they're gambling!

The sacred men's room code: stare straight ahead, no talking, and definitely no AI productivity tool recommendations while someone's mid-stream. Nothing worse than being cornered at the urinal by the office AI evangelist explaining how GitHub Copilot will save your career with those made-up productivity percentages. Just let me pee in peace before telling me I'll be automated out of existence, thanks.

The ultimate programming paradox exposed! First frame accuses programmers of not being able to write code without stealing someone else's. Then ChatGPT smugly asks "CAN YOU?" only to be met with a devastating realization in the final frame—neither can AI. The irony is chef's kiss perfect. ChatGPT was literally trained on other people's code from GitHub repos, Stack Overflow answers, and documentation. It's like being called out for plagiarism by someone who memorized the entire library. The circle of theft is now complete!

Turns out both chefs and AI "developers" are just throwing ingredients together and hoping something edible comes out. The difference? Chefs actually know what basil is. Ten years of writing clean, maintainable code just to be replaced by someone who knows how to type "make me a full-stack app with blockchain integration" into a text box. At least the spaghetti I'm eating tastes better than the spaghetti code these AI tools are churning out.