People In The US, Probably…

The double standard in AI ethics is absolutely wild. Artists get the angry flower treatment when AI scrapes their artwork without permission, but suddenly everyone's a calm little daisy when GitHub Copilot yoinks thousands of lines of GPL-licensed code. The difference? Programmers aren't considered "real artists" despite crafting elegant algorithms that would make Picasso jealous. Next time someone says "it's just code," remind them their entire digital life runs on that "just code" someone wrote. The irony is we'll probably use AI to generate the angry tweets about AI stealing our code.

GASP! You mean to tell me all these fancy-schmancy "revolutionary" AI browsers are just Chrome in a trench coat?! THE BETRAYAL! 😱 Look at those innocent browser icons up top, flaunting their unique personalities like they're special snowflakes. Then BAM! Put on those reality glasses and what do you see? CHROMIUM. CHROMIUM EVERYWHERE. It's like finding out all your favorite "craft" sodas come from the same factory! Google's just sitting in the corner twirling its evil mustache while Firefox desperately tries to remind us it's the only true rebel left in this Chrome-ified dystopia. I'm having an existential crisis over here!

Oh look, a scientific paper proving what we all suspected: our brains turn to mush when we outsource thinking to AI. The title is actually a hidden message – "Does LLMs Really Makes Us Dumb" – with the first letters spelling it out. Brilliant academic trolling right there. Those fancy brain scans? They're showing our neurons basically taking a vacation when using ChatGPT for essays. Seven MIT researchers spent grant money to scientifically confirm that copying AI homework makes you dumber. Could've just asked any TA grading freshman papers. Next groundbreaking study: water is wet, and Stack Overflow copy-paste makes junior devs forget how loops work.

When you tell the client your AI-powered prototype is "almost done," they see a beautiful Old West town ready for action. Meanwhile, you're looking at a construction site held together by scaffolding, duct tape, and prayers to the TypeScript gods. Sure, the facade looks impressive from the street view, but behind the scenes? It's all exposed beams, missing walls, and architectural decisions that would make any code reviewer weep. That's AI-generated code for you—looks production-ready in the demo, but the moment you peek under the hood, you realize you're basically debugging a half-finished movie set. At least it compiles... sometimes.

Ancient Egyptians built massive pyramids with nothing but stone tools and manpower. Meanwhile, modern developers need sixteen JavaScript frameworks, three cloud subscriptions, and a $3000 MacBook Pro with 64GB RAM just to center a div. And they still complain about the Wi-Fi being slow.

Ah yes, the classic "become a data scientist in 50 days" roadmap. Master Python in 5 days, R in another 5, and calculus in a weekend. By day 41, you're predicting which passengers survive the Titanic—a task that's apparently more complex than learning an entire programming language. The most realistic part? The Titanic project sinking just like your expectations when you realize actual data science requires years of study, not a 7-week crash course.