Ips Vs. Oled Explained For The Car Enthusiasts

Ah, the evolution of debugging assistance. In 2019, you'd explain your problem to a rubber duck (a legitimate debugging technique where explaining your code aloud helps you spot the error). The duck just sits there, judging you silently while you ramble about line 43. Fast forward to 2025: Now you just bark "FIX THE ERROR" at ChatGPT, Claude, or whatever AI overlord is running your IDE. No need to understand the problem anymore - just demand a solution and watch as the machines do what took us mere mortals hours of Stack Overflow scrolling. The real error was thinking we'd still be doing our own debugging.

Content "Borderlands 4 is overpriced and unoptimized! Why Gearbox doesn't care about quality? 200000+ steam users on their way to financially encourage Gearbox to not care about quality

Ah, the modern tech hero's journey: "I wrote a prompt, AI generated an API, and now I'm basically the next unicorn founder." Sure buddy, and I once wrote a regex that worked on the first try – doesn't mean I'm Jeff Bezos. The gap between "my AI prompt worked once" and "billion-dollar company" is roughly the same as the gap between "I installed Linux" and "I now run NASA." Those compute bills will hit harder than the reality that prompt engineering isn't the same as actually engineering. Ten years in the trenches and I've learned one truth: the harder someone humble-brags about how easy something was, the more spectacularly it'll explode in production.

Someone's trying to communicate with their computer like it's 2045 and AI has taken over web development. They're literally asking their machine to build a responsive website with big pictures, custom fonts, fancy menus with "whooosh" animations, and fast load times—all in plain English. Then signs off with "Thanks, Human" like they're the robot giving orders. The "PS no bugs :)" is chef's kiss. Yeah buddy, just tell the computer "no bugs" and they'll magically disappear. If only it worked that way. We've been trying that with our code reviews for decades. Either this person is from the future where AI does everything, or they're a client who thinks programming works like ordering at a drive-thru. Spoiler: it's probably the latter.

Fixing a bug in 30 minutes? Easy peasy, disgusted face. Spending an entire workday explaining to ChatGPT what your codebase does, your business logic, and why that one legacy function from 2014 can't be touched? Chef's kiss. The irony is delicious. We've gone from "let me just fix this myself" to "let me spend 8x longer teaching an AI about all our technical debt so it can suggest the same fix I would've made anyway." Future job posting: "Senior Prompt Engineer - Must have 5+ years experience explaining code to machines that pretend to understand."

Someone really just asked why Wikipedia exists when ChatGPT can give you answers. Brother, ChatGPT is out here confidently telling people that spiders have 6 legs and Napoleon won Waterloo. The reply is chef's kiss perfection: "You're the people in the floaty chairs at the start of Wall-E." Translation: you've gotten so lazy that you're willing to trust an AI that makes stuff up 30% of the time over a crowdsourced encyclopedia with citations and actual humans fact-checking. Wikipedia has sources, edit histories, and talk pages. ChatGPT has... confidence and a gambling problem with facts. But sure, let's replace peer-reviewed knowledge with spicy autocomplete. What could go wrong?