At Least No More LeetCode I Guess

Oh look, a savage burn on both AI and frontend developers in one go! The meme suggests you need a "thinking model" AI for backend work because it requires actual logic and problem-solving. Meanwhile, frontend work apparently just needs a "non-thinking model" because who needs brains when you're just making things pretty, right? As someone who's done both, I can confirm this is hilariously unfair. Frontend devs spend hours debugging why a div is 3 pixels off while backend devs act superior because they wrote a function that crashes only most of the time instead of all the time. The real joke is that we're all just trying to convince computers to do what we want, and failing spectacularly in our own special ways.

The bell curve of intelligence strikes again! We've got the blissfully unaware 70 IQ folks on the left who code because it brings them joy. Then there's the 130 IQ zen masters on the right who've transcended the existential dread and also code for pure enjoyment. Meanwhile, the "intellectual" 100 IQ middle-grounders are having panic attacks about AI stealing their jobs. Classic case of being just smart enough to be terrified but not smart enough to realize it doesn't matter. Honestly, the real galaxy brain move is coding because you enjoy it while the AI learns to handle all those tedious JIRA tickets you hate anyway.

The inevitable hipster-ification of web development has arrived. Just like artisanal coffee shops charging $9 for "hand-poured" water, we'll soon have developers selling "organic, handwritten, non-AI websites" at premium prices. Next they'll be telling us their HTML is free-range and their CSS was harvested during a full moon. Can't wait for the "small-batch, locally-sourced JavaScript" trend to hit.

The unholy fusion of dog and ostrich is the perfect mascot for modern coding—front-end looking majestic while the backend is just winging it. "It gets most of its code from StackOverflow" hits way too close to home for anyone who's ever built a "custom solution" by stitching together 17 different answers from 2014. And that smug little "ChatGPT is a better programmer than you" caption? Pure psychological warfare. The real joke is we're all just three keyboard shortcuts away from being replaced by an AI that learned to code by scraping the same StackOverflow posts we did. The circle of technical debt is complete!

That "30-minute AI interview" is the tech industry's biggest lie since "we offer competitive salaries." The meme shows what actually happens when you try to take an AI interview at home - pure chaos erupting while you're supposed to be in "a silent room with a clear voice." Every developer who's done these knows the truth. You carefully schedule it during your lunch break, then your neighbor decides it's the perfect time to test their new chainsaw, your cat knocks over a plant, and someone starts a kitchen fire. Meanwhile, the AI is like "I didn't quite catch that, could you repeat your approach to implementing a binary search tree?" The real coding challenge isn't the algorithm - it's maintaining your sanity while your house burns down around you.

Ah, the classic "spend 2 minutes and 2 seconds to count to 10" problem. ChatGPT just turned basic geometry into a research dissertation. That's the same energy as developers who write 200 lines of documentation for a function that returns true or false. The best part? It's clearly a heptagon (7 sides), but ChatGPT's counting each "distinct corner" like it's being paid by the vertex. Next up: AI spending 4 minutes explaining why 2+2=5 with "reasoned thinking."