Another AI Startup Exposed

Ah, the modern "programmer" who only knows how to prompt ChatGPT. Nothing says "I've mastered coding" like typing "Write me a function that..." instead of actually learning syntax. Ten years of experience? More like ten minutes of experience with an AI that does the heavy lifting. The rest of us spent years debugging pointer arithmetic while these folks are getting violently rejected at technical interviews the moment someone asks them to reverse a linked list without digital assistance.

Turns out the most advanced AI was just 700 people in a trenchcoat. Builder.ai allegedly sold "AI" that was actually just outsourced developers pretending to be Natasha the chatbot. The classic "artificial" intelligence that's actually just regular intelligence with extra steps. Next revelation: ChatGPT is just a guy named Greg in a basement with really fast typing skills.

The eternal battle between sales and engineering continues! Sales execs looking at new projects like they're discovering the One Ring to rule them all – "Let's sprinkle some blockchain and AI on it!" Meanwhile, developers are channeling their inner Aragorn with a firm "NO" that contains the exhaustion of a thousand pointless standups. It's the corporate version of "We have blockchain at home. The blockchain at home: an Excel spreadsheet with a password." The irony? Most projects that "need" blockchain and AI could be solved with a decent database and some if/else statements.

The rarest sight in AI development: code that works on the first try. This image shows NASA engineers celebrating a successful mission, but in the AI world, it's more like celebrating when someone's neural network doesn't immediately catch fire or hallucinate that birds are government drones. Builder.ai probably shared some code that actually ran without 47 dependency errors, 18 version conflicts, and a cryptic error message about missing semicolons in a language that doesn't use semicolons.

Ah yes, the pinnacle of modern software engineering: "Just dump your entire codebase into an AI and pray." Because nothing says "professional developer" like treating your source code like a desperate college essay you need fixed the night before it's due. Who needs code reviews, debugging skills, or understanding your own code when you can just throw the whole mess at an AI and let it sort through your spaghetti logic? Next up: "Submit your entire database as a tweet and wait for hackers to optimize it for you!"

The perfect metaphor for GitHub Copilot's autocomplete functionality! You start typing some code with a clear intention in mind, and Copilot jumps in with the confidence of someone who absolutely knows what you're going to say... except it's hilariously off-target. Just like when you're about to deliver a profound statement and someone interjects with "sandwiches?" The AI is trying so hard to be helpful but sometimes the suggestions are so wildly disconnected from your actual coding intentions that you can't help but laugh. It's that special relationship where you type "const authenticate = async (user" and Copilot suggests "...PizzaDeliveryOptions) =>"