Engineers Ain't Made For Meetings

Adding more project managers and consultants to a sinking project is like adding more people to the top deck of a sinking boat. "Why aren't we moving faster?" asks the clueless executive as the poor dev in the water desperately tries to paddle. Classic corporate solution: throw more management at the problem while the actual workforce drowns. The Brooks' Law special – adding more people to a late project just makes it later. But hey, at least there's plenty of people to document the failure in a retrospective PowerPoint!

The classic developer approach to project management: break down that intimidating monolith into bite-sized chunks, then promptly ignore all of them. It's like refactoring your procrastination for maximum efficiency. The beauty is that now you can feel accomplished about organizing your avoidance rather than just avoiding one big thing. Task parallelization at its finest - distributing the guilt across multiple cores.

The GitHub contribution graph doesn't lie! Middle guy's profile is blazing green with daily commits while the other two are practically digital ghosts with just a couple sad green squares. This is the perfect visualization of the developer bell curve - 14% barely code, 72% code their faces off trying to stay employed, and the other 14% figured out they only need to commit once a month and still get paid the same. The crying glasses guy is every junior dev padding their GitHub to impress recruiters while the other two are either brilliant 10x engineers or completely checked out. Either way, they're all collecting the same paycheck!

Ah yes, corporate problem-solving at its finest. Developer: "I'm burning out." HR: "Here's a survey." Developer: *honestly admits burnout* HR: "You're fired." Problem solved! Just like how I fix memory leaks by shutting down the server. Can't have burnout if you don't have employees. The classic "have you tried turning it off and not turning it back on again" approach to human resources.

The eternal battle between developers and project managers continues! This meme perfectly captures the skepticism devs feel when a PM claims they're making life easier. In theory, PMs should shield developers from distractions and streamline workflows. In practice? They're often the ones introducing new tools, changing requirements mid-sprint, and asking "quick questions" that derail your entire afternoon of deep work. The silent stare in the third panel says everything a developer is thinking but can't say in the Slack channel. It's that universal "sure, Jan" moment that happens right before you get an invite to another "quick sync" that somehow lasts 90 minutes.

The face of pure, unadulterated doubt . Every developer knows that look—it's the one you make when your colleague swears their 5-year-old Stack Overflow solution will fix everything. The same expression you had when the junior dev said "I rewrote it in Rust over the weekend" or when management promised "just one more small feature before release." That suspicious squint is the universal BS detector that evolves after your 50th "final version" turns into version 17.3.2-hotfix-please-god-work.