Engineers Ain't Made For Meetings

The AUDACITY of John! 😱 Faced with the CRUSHING WEIGHT of 3 bugs, 2 features, and a meeting, our hero makes the most REVOLUTIONARY decision in software engineering history... he just goes to sleep! 💤 This is basically the programmer's equivalent of looking at a burning building and deciding to take a nap. Pure. GENIUS. While the rest of us are mainlining caffeine and having existential crises over semicolons, John has transcended the mortal plane of developer anxiety. We should all aspire to this level of emotional detachment from our Jira tickets!

THE ABSOLUTE HERO WE NEED! A t-shirt that says "#NaaS - No as a Service" for stakeholder meetings?! GENIUS! 🙌 For those of us who've survived the 47th request to "just add this one tiny feature" that would literally require rewriting the entire codebase, this shirt is basically BATTLE ARMOR. Imagine the gasps when you turn around in that Zoom call and the product manager sees your silent rebellion against scope creep! It's like having a force field against "can we just..." questions. I'm literally DYING at the thought of someone having the audacity to actually wear this. The modern developer's equivalent of bringing a sword to a gunfight - except the sword is SASS and the gunfight is a 2-hour meeting that could've been an email! 💀

The only programming advice worth taking is the one you'll find on that little strip of wisdom: "IF IT WORKS, DON'T TOUCH IT." Nothing strikes more fear into a developer's heart than having to modify code that's somehow functioning despite violating every principle of software engineering. That magical spaghetti mess held together by duct tape and prayers? Yeah, that's staying exactly as is. The moment you try to "improve" it or "refactor" it, you'll unleash chaos that'll have you explaining to your boss why the entire production system is suddenly speaking Klingon. The unwritten 11th commandment of programming: thou shalt not mess with working code.

The AUDACITY of clients to call their soul-crushing, architecture-destroying requests "just a small change"! 💀 Meanwhile, there I am, completely rewriting the entire codebase, questioning my career choices, and contemplating a new life as a goat farmer because their "tiny tweak" just demolished three weeks of work. The look on my face says it all - this is my villain origin story in four panels! That helpless shrug at the end? That's me accepting my fate while my git history weeps in the background.

The battle cry of developers who've been through one too many sprint retrospectives where they somehow finished 70 points but now have 100 points remaining. Nothing says "efficiency" like spending 90% of your time in planning meetings about how to reduce meetings. Or using poker cards to estimate work because apparently, software complexity scales exactly like a Texas Hold'em hand. My favorite part is how we pretend story points aren't time measurements while simultaneously tracking velocity. Math is hard when you're busy "grooming" the backlog—a term that should absolutely get you on a watchlist. That pie chart showing 95% planning and 5% work is the most accurate documentation ever produced in an agile environment.

That car suspension is the perfect metaphor for legacy code that's been "temporarily fixed" with zip ties and prayers. Just like how developers keep promising to refactor that horrific spaghetti code module that somehow powers the entire application. The classic "we'll clean it up next sprint" is the software equivalent of duct-taping your car's axle and hoping it survives another 10,000 miles. Spoiler alert: it's still running in production three years later, and everyone's too scared to touch it because "it works, don't mess with it."