Divide And Ignore Algorithm

Someone finally said it. You know your daily standup has devolved into pure performance art when the team spends more time discussing which outdated methodology to pretend they're following than actually shipping code. "Should we do waterfall in 2026?" Sure, right after we finish migrating to COBOL. "Let's use NPC methodology!" Yeah, that tracks—most people in these meetings are just running their dialogue scripts anyway. The brutal truth hits different though. Agile was supposed to free us from endless meetings and documentation. Instead, we got sprint planning, sprint reviews, retrospectives, backlog grooming, daily standups, and quarterly PI planning sessions where we discuss how agile we are. The real product isn't software anymore—it's generating enough agile theater to justify the Jira subscription. Meanwhile, the actual code gets written in the 2 hours between meetings when everyone's status is set to "Do Not Disturb" and Slack notifications are muted.

The eternal programmer's confession! Writing documentation is like going to the dentist—nobody wants to do it until the pain becomes unbearable. The only time most of us actually document our code is when we've written something so convoluted that even we can't decipher it two days later. It's basically leaving cryptic notes for our future selves who will inevitably curse our past selves. The circle of programming life!

The eternal dev team cycle of pain: You fix a bug and submit a PR, then sit there refreshing GitHub like Pablo Escobar waiting for someone—ANYONE—to review your code. Meanwhile, the project manager is wandering around wondering why features are still stuck in QA purgatory. Classic chicken-and-egg problem where nothing moves because everyone's waiting for someone else to do their part first. The circle of software development hell that transcends programming languages and team sizes.

The eternal cycle of game development hell, illustrated through Omni-Man's bloody lecture. That moment when management keeps throwing money at broken, unfinished ports instead of giving devs proper time to finish the product. Just another day in the industry where the "ship now, patch later" mentality reigns supreme. Meanwhile, QA testers sit in the corner, reports ignored, muttering "I literally warned you about this exact bug three months ago."

The corporate theater of "Scrum" in its natural habitat. Company claims they're using Scrum methodology, but when pressed for details, they confess it's actually waterfall with sprints awkwardly bolted on—basically waterfall wearing a Scrum costume. It's like claiming you're vegan while eating a burger and explaining "Well, I chew in 2-week increments." The relief on the questioner's face says it all: finally, someone admitted what everyone already knew. The charade can end, and actual work can begin.

Ah, the classic "sell the dream, build it later" startup strategy. These two are basically running the tech equivalent of a Ponzi scheme with PowerPoint slides. They've mastered the ancient art of "requirement gathering" by letting the customer unknowingly fund the entire development cycle. The beauty is that by the time the customer realizes they've paid for vaporware, you've either built something that kinda works or secured another round of funding from some VC who thinks "pre-revenue" is a legitimate business model. Ten years in the industry and I've seen this cycle repeat more times than git commits on a Friday afternoon. The smug expressions say it all – "Can you believe they actually bought that demo we cobbled together last night?"